+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
Sale

Neutropenia Treatment Market - Global Forecast 2025-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 182 Pages
  • November 2025
  • Region: Global
  • 360iResearch™
  • ID: 5674204
UP TO OFF until Jan 01st 2026
1h Free Analyst Time
1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

The neutropenia treatment market is evolving rapidly as providers, payers, and manufacturers intensify their focus on innovative, patient-centric strategies across the oncology care continuum.

Market Snapshot: Neutropenia Treatment Market Growth Trajectory

The neutropenia treatment market grew from USD 15.08 billion in 2024 to USD 15.85 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 22.54 billion by 2032, advancing at a CAGR of 5.14%. This growth is driven by expanded adoption of biosimilars, advances in biologics, and renewed emphasis on personalized patient care protocols.

Scope & Segmentation

  • Treatment Type: Filgrastim (300 mcg, 480 mcg, 600 mcg), Lenograstim (3 mg, 5 mg), Pegfilgrastim (6 mg).
  • Therapy Class: Biosimilar, Originator.
  • Route of Administration: Intravenous Injection, Subcutaneous Injection.
  • Distribution Channel: Hospital Pharmacy (Inpatient Pharmacy, Outpatient Pharmacy), Online Pharmacy, Retail Pharmacy (Chain Pharmacy, Independent Pharmacy).
  • End User: Ambulatory Care Centers, Clinics, Home Care, Hospitals (Private, Public).
  • Patient Age Group: Adult, Geriatric, Pediatric.
  • Severity: Mild, Moderate, Severe.
  • Regions: Americas (North America: United States, Canada, Mexico; Latin America: Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Peru), Europe, Middle East & Africa (Europe: United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Sweden, Poland, Switzerland; Middle East: United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Israel; Africa: South Africa, Nigeria, Egypt, Kenya), Asia-Pacific (China, India, Japan, Australia, South Korea, Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan).
  • Key Companies: Amgen Inc., Sandoz International GmbH, Pfizer Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Viatris Inc., Coherus BioSciences, Inc., Fresenius Kabi AG, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Biocon Limited, Celltrion, Inc.

Key Takeaways: Market, Technology, and Strategy

  • Emerging biologic therapies and innovative delivery models are changing neutropenia management standards, emphasizing tailored regimens for distinct patient populations.
  • Biosimilars are reshaping pricing structures and procurement strategies, prompting both originator and biosimilar manufacturers to enhance patient support offerings.
  • Digital health integration enables real-time neutrophil monitoring, supports predictive analytics, and drives earlier clinical interventions.
  • Hospital and pharmacy networks are optimizing operations through collaborative purchasing agreements and technology-driven distribution frameworks.
  • Global regional disparities persist, with developed markets leveraging robust reimbursement infrastructure and emerging economies focusing on affordable treatment alternatives and local manufacturing capacity.
  • Segment-specific trends include shifting preferences for single-dose versus multi-dose therapies and increased demand for flexible home administration options across patient age groups and severity profiles.

Tariff Impact: Navigating Regulatory and Supply Chain Challenges

Impending United States tariff adjustments are set to affect the neutropenia treatment supply chain, influencing sourcing of recombinant proteins and biologic components. Manufacturers are expected to review procurement strategies and consider localization or diversification in response to projected shifts in input costs. As distribution partners—including hospitals and specialty pharmacies—face budgetary impacts, alignment on supply continuity and strategic scenario planning will be critical to maintain patient access and operational stability.

Methodology & Data Sources

This report leverages in-depth interviews with key opinion leaders—hematologists, oncologists, clinical pharmacists—and comprehensive surveys of pharmacy directors and specialty managers. Qualitative findings are complemented by secondary research from peer-reviewed journals, regulatory filings, corporate presentations, and health agency data. Rigorous cross-validation and expert panels underpin the credibility of analysis and recommendations.

Why This Report Matters

  • Facilitates data-driven decision making for investment, procurement, and clinical strategy in the neutropenia treatment market.
  • Offers actionable insights into emerging regulatory, technological, and therapeutic trends shaping the landscape for providers and suppliers.
  • Supports scenario planning around tariff and supply chain variables to ensure business continuity and patient care resilience.

Conclusion

Senior decision-makers can use this report to anticipate sector-wide transformation, guide strategic investments, and foster cross-functional alignment for optimized neutropenia care delivery. The actionable insights support robust stakeholder collaboration in a dynamic, evolving treatment landscape.

 

Additional Product Information:

  • Purchase of this report includes 1 year online access with quarterly updates.
  • This report can be updated on request. Please contact our Customer Experience team using the Ask a Question widget on our website.

Table of Contents

1. Preface
1.1. Objectives of the Study
1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
1.3. Years Considered for the Study
1.4. Currency & Pricing
1.5. Language
1.6. Stakeholders
2. Research Methodology
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Overview
5. Market Insights
5.1. Market entry of pegfilgrastim on-body injector devices improving patient adherence
5.2. Rising adoption of biosimilar filgrastim products driving cost competitive dynamics
5.3. Development of oral granulocyte colony-stimulating factor analogs for outpatient use
5.4. Integration of pharmacogenomics for personalized neutropenia prophylaxis dosing strategies
5.5. Pipeline focus on CXCR4 antagonists for accelerated neutrophil recovery in transplant patients
5.6. Expansion of digital monitoring tools to track neutrophil counts and treatment compliance
5.7. Increased supportive care reimbursement policies boosting adoption of G-CSF therapies
5.8. Growth of emerging markets with rising chemotherapy-induced neutropenia incidence rates
6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
8. Neutropenia Treatment Market, by Treatment Type
8.1. Filgrastim
8.1.1. 300 mcg
8.1.2. 480 mcg
8.1.3. 600 mcg
8.2. Lenograstim
8.2.1. 3 mg
8.2.2. 5 mg
8.3. Pegfilgrastim
8.3.1. 6 mg
9. Neutropenia Treatment Market, by Therapy Class
9.1. Biosimilar
9.2. Originator
10. Neutropenia Treatment Market, by Route Of Administration
10.1. Intravenous Injection
10.2. Subcutaneous Injection
11. Neutropenia Treatment Market, by Distribution Channel
11.1. Hospital Pharmacy
11.1.1. Inpatient Pharmacy
11.1.2. Outpatient Pharmacy
11.2. Online Pharmacy
11.3. Retail Pharmacy
11.3.1. Chain Pharmacy
11.3.2. Independent Pharmacy
12. Neutropenia Treatment Market, by End User
12.1. Ambulatory Care Centers
12.2. Clinics
12.3. Home Care
12.4. Hospitals
12.4.1. Private
12.4.2. Public
13. Neutropenia Treatment Market, by Patient Age Group
13.1. Adult
13.2. Geriatric
13.3. Pediatric
14. Neutropenia Treatment Market, by Severity
14.1. Mild
14.2. Moderate
14.3. Severe
15. Neutropenia Treatment Market, by Region
15.1. Americas
15.1.1. North America
15.1.2. Latin America
15.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
15.2.1. Europe
15.2.2. Middle East
15.2.3. Africa
15.3. Asia-Pacific
16. Neutropenia Treatment Market, by Group
16.1. ASEAN
16.2. GCC
16.3. European Union
16.4. BRICS
16.5. G7
16.6. NATO
17. Neutropenia Treatment Market, by Country
17.1. United States
17.2. Canada
17.3. Mexico
17.4. Brazil
17.5. United Kingdom
17.6. Germany
17.7. France
17.8. Russia
17.9. Italy
17.10. Spain
17.11. China
17.12. India
17.13. Japan
17.14. Australia
17.15. South Korea
18. Competitive Landscape
18.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
18.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
18.3. Competitive Analysis
18.3.1. Amgen Inc.
18.3.2. Sandoz International GmbH
18.3.3. Pfizer Inc.
18.3.4. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
18.3.5. Viatris Inc.
18.3.6. Coherus BioSciences, Inc.
18.3.7. Fresenius Kabi AG
18.3.8. Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
18.3.9. Biocon Limited
18.3.10. Celltrion, Inc.

Companies Mentioned

The companies profiled in this Neutropenia Treatment market report include:
  • Amgen Inc.
  • Sandoz International GmbH
  • Pfizer Inc.
  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
  • Viatris Inc.
  • Coherus BioSciences, Inc.
  • Fresenius Kabi AG
  • Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
  • Biocon Limited
  • Celltrion, Inc.

Table Information