+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

North America Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Outlook, 2029

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 88 Pages
  • September 2024
  • Region: North America
  • Bonafide Research
  • ID: 6004492
10% Free customization
1h Free Analyst Time
10% Free customization

This report comes with 10% free customization, enabling you to add data that meets your specific business needs.

1h Free Analyst Time

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

With every thread counting in this intricate web of critical infrastructure in North America, the protection solution market is rapidly evolving to fortify these vital systems against a myriad of threats. There has been a sea change in threat intelligence platforms in respect to real-time monitoring and analysis of threats that occur. These platforms are leveraging AI and machine learning to improve the identification of risks and their proactivity in reduction, hence improving the security posture for critical infrastructures. As a step toward improving the adoption rate of managed security services, more organizations are starting to outsource their security operations to specialized providers.

Outsourcing security operations to MSSPs allows companies to draw on their expertise to manage and monitor their security infrastructure for continuous protection from threats. With increasing vital elements of infrastructure going to the cloud, there is a keener interest in the security of clouds. Solutions designed to protect cloud infrastructure and data are fast becoming essential components in CIP strategies, speaking to the unique security challenges associated with cloud computing. Blockchain technology is under study for its capabilities to improve vital infrastructure security. This is promising for many applications which require secure data transactions and making them tamper-proof, owing to its decentralized and immutable nature.

The new 5G networks bring along a set of challenges to the security in critical infrastructure. On one hand, the high speed and low latency of 5G enhance connectivity; on the other hand, it increases the attack surface. Another critical area primarily focuses on the security of 5G networks and how the architecture will integrate or interoperate with existing infrastructure. In the U.S. federal regulations, such as those stipulated under CISA and FISMA, provide a uniform platform for safeguarding critical infrastructure.

Most states have set regulations and requirements that impact how infrastructure will be secured. Sectors have specific standards and guidelines. As an example, standards in the energy sector are defined by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation, while those for transportation infrastructure are determined by the Transportation Security Administration.

According to the research report "North America Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Outlook, 2029" the North America Critical Infrastructure Protection market was valued at more than USD 47 Billion in 2023. Trends include a growing trend toward managed security services as companies outsource vital infrastructure protection to experts. MSS providers provide specialized services in terms of continuous monitoring, threat intelligence, and incident response. These provide the capability to improve security posture without developing large in-house capabilities. Advanced Persistent Threats include Critical infrastructure is under severe threat from APTs.

This typically translates to long-term, focused attacks that are sponsored or conducted by well-financed opponents. Strategies mitigating APTs include the implementation of state-of-the-art threat detection systems, periodic security assessment processes, and effective incident response plans. Software supply chain attacks are becoming more and more commonplace. A supply chain attack, which is engineered to grant access to the very important critical infrastructure, can occur when a third-party vendor is breached. Mitigating such a major threat involves supply chain vetting and monitoring, implementation of strict access control, and supply chain process security.

Advanced CIP solutions can be costly to implement, especially for small and micro organizations. Of course, growth of the market could be hampered by the high costs for buying, deploying, and maintaining advanced security technologies. On the other hand, balancing security investments against budgetary pressure has remained one of the challenging tasks for many organizations. Governments in North America are majorly boosting their funding to protect critical infrastructure, especially in the United States and Canada.

These are projects like the IIJA in the U.S., which commits billions of dollars to the modernization of infrastructure hardening and the enhancement of security. The U.S. Department of Energy announced $12 million in funding for six research and developments, all relating to breakthrough cybersecurity solutions that will make energy supply systems installed, designed, operated and maintained into a posture that can survive and recover quickly from cyber-attacks.

Market Drivers

  • Advanced Cybersecurity Threats: In North America, the rise in sophisticated cyberattacks, particularly ransomware targeting critical infrastructures like healthcare and energy, is a major driver for CIP investments. The complex and evolving nature of these threats demands advanced cybersecurity solutions, compelling organizations to invest in AI-driven detection systems, real-time monitoring, and comprehensive threat intelligence. The U.S. government’s emphasis on cybersecurity, through agencies like CISA, further accelerates this demand, making it a critical driver for the CIP market in the region.
  • Government Mandates and Regulations: Stringent government regulations, such as the NERC CIP standards in the U.S., are pivotal in driving the market. These regulations mandate specific security protocols for protecting critical infrastructures, especially in the energy sector. Compliance is not optional, and failure to adhere can result in severe penalties. This regulatory pressure forces organizations to continually upgrade and enhance their security measures, thereby driving market growth in the region.

Market Challenges

  • Integration Complexity: A significant challenge in North America is the complexity involved in integrating various security systems, such as physical security, cybersecurity, and emergency response systems. Ensuring seamless interoperability between these systems is difficult due to differing technologies, protocols, and legacy systems. The challenge is further compounded by the need to maintain uninterrupted services while implementing these integrations, making it a critical hurdle in the region.
  • High Cost of Implementation: Implementing comprehensive CIP measures is financially burdensome, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The high cost of advanced cybersecurity technologies, physical security systems, and ongoing compliance requirements can be prohibitive. This financial strain is a significant challenge, as it limits the ability of many organizations to fully protect their infrastructures, leading to potential vulnerabilities.

Market Trends

  • Increased Public-Private Collaboration: There is a growing trend of collaboration between government entities and the private sector in North America. This partnership is crucial for sharing threat intelligence, developing standards, and implementing best practices across sectors. Public-private collaborations are increasingly seen as vital for enhancing the resilience of critical infrastructures, driving this trend in the region.
  • Adoption of AI and ML in CIP: The adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) for predictive threat analytics is a significant trend in North America. These technologies enable more proactive approaches to CIP by identifying potential threats before they materialize. AI-driven solutions are being increasingly integrated into cybersecurity frameworks, physical security systems, and emergency response mechanisms, marking a shift towards more intelligent and automated protection strategies.

The dominant position of North America in the critical infrastructure protection market for Physical Security & Safety lies in enhanced awareness and stringent regulations, subsequent to the rise in both natural and man-made threat events and incidents.

The deployment of advanced physical security mechanisms has dominated the global scenario in this particular region. First of all, the United States being a superpower faces a great threat from terrorist attacks and cyber attacks and consequently requires more advanced security. Though incidents like 9/11 pushed enhancing security solutions for several critical infrastructures, a significant amount of investment has been made in various physical security solutions. Another reason is that North America has to face a number of different natural disasters, such as hurricanes, wildfires, and earthquakes, and various forms of critical service disruptions.

The request for continuous strong infrastructure and a comprehensive security framework has been the drive behind this vulnerability. Furthermore, technological advancement in the region has facilitated innovation in security solutions with the help of AI-powered surveillance systems, biometric access controls, and advanced perimeter securities. Strong government regulatory policies, such as the Critical Infrastructure Protection Act in the U.S., have, in effect implemeted high-security standards, and as such, businesses have been driven to invest in up-to-the-minute physical security and safety measures which protect not just life, but the actual facilities and infrastructure used within these industries. Industry "movers and shakers", and the region's solid economic standing have had to do with the physical security market's growth.

The Energy & Power is leading North America in critical infrastructure protection market is due to the increasing focus on securing critical energy assets and infrastructure against cyber threats and physical attacks.

The energy sector, particularly the power grid, is a prime target for cyber attacks and physical sabotage due to its critical importance to national security and economic stability. In recent years, there have been several high-profile incidents, such as the 2015 and 2016 cyber attacks on the Ukrainian power grid, which have highlighted the vulnerability of energy infrastructure to malicious actors. As a result, governments and energy companies in North America have been investing heavily in critical infrastructure protection solutions to mitigate these risks.

One of the key drivers of the critical infrastructure protection market in the energy sector is the growing adoption of smart grid technologies, which have increased the attack surface for cyber threats. Smart grids rely on advanced communication and control systems, which can be exploited by hackers if not properly secured. Energy companies are investing in cybersecurity solutions such as firewalls, intrusion detection and prevention systems, and security information and event management (SIEM) tools to protect their networks and systems from cyber attacks. In addition to cyber threats, the energy sector is vulnerable to physical attacks, such as sabotage of power plants, transmission lines, and substations.

Energy companies are deploying physical security solutions such as surveillance cameras, access control systems, and perimeter intrusion detection systems to protect their critical assets from physical threats. The North American critical infrastructure protection market is being driven by government regulations and standards, such as the North American Electric Reliability Corporation Critical Infrastructure Protection (NERC CIP) standards, which mandate the implementation of security controls for the bulk electric system. Energy companies are investing in compliance solutions to meet these regulatory requirements and avoid penalties.

Solutions is leading North America in the critical infrastructure protection market primarily due to its comprehensive approach to security that integrates advanced technology, regulatory support, and significant investment in cybersecurity.

The critical infrastructure protection (CIP) market in North America has experienced substantial growth, driven by a combination of factors that position solutions as the frontrunner in this sector. One of the main reasons for this leadership is the region's robust technological environment, which fosters innovation and the development of cutting-edge security solutions. Companies in North America, such as BAE Systems, Lockheed Martin, and Northrop Grumman, are at the forefront of creating advanced protective measures, including real-time threat detection systems, AI-driven monitoring, and converged security frameworks.

These innovations are essential for addressing the increasing complexity and variety of threats facing critical infrastructure, from cyberattacks to natural disasters. Furthermore, the region benefits from stringent regulatory frameworks, such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework, which encourages organizations to adopt the latest security technologies and practices, ensuring a high level of resilience against potential threats. The significant investments in research and development (R&D) have bolstered the capabilities of North American firms, enabling them to stay ahead of emerging threats and maintain a competitive edge.

The emphasis on cybersecurity is particularly notable, as the region has witnessed a surge in cyber threats that necessitate sophisticated protective measures. This has led to a greater demand for integrated solutions that combine both physical safety and cybersecurity, creating a holistic approach to critical infrastructure protection. Public-private partnerships have emerged as a vital strategy for enhancing national resilience, allowing for collaborative efforts in research, information sharing, and the development of innovative CIP solutions.

The US to emerge as a leader in the North American critical infrastructure protection market are its vast and varied critical infrastructure network, high-level government initiatives, and substantial investment by the private sector in security measures.

The leadership position is a consequence of an interplay based on economic, political, and technical factors in the United States. The US is among the leading countries globally, with critical and most assorted infrastructures cutting across energy, finance, health, transportation, and telecommunications, among others. Whereas the comprehensive infrastructure is among the biggest strengths, it subjects the US to enormous attacks both physical and cyber threats and, therefore needs robust security measures. It is evident that the US government has been putting in great efforts to ensure the protection of such critical assets, from the creation of PDD-21 and the formation of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) in 2018.

All these efforts have set up a firm regulatory framework and guidelines for the protection of critical infrastructure, further urging both the public and private sectors to invest more in security solutions. There are considerable reservoirs of innovation in the field of technologies for infrastructure protection today located largely in the United States, with the largest companies specializing in technology and cybersecurity. This, therefore, has led to disparate areas of expertise and enormous resources unparalleled in deployment and has made rapid strides in deploying latest security solutions.

The same holds for the United States with a different set of geopolitical problems and consistently being the focus of gunning cyber attacks, so it is only but natural to increase spending on critical infrastructure protection. The federal structure of the country is another key contributor, with many of the crucial states often at the forefront and taking measures of critical infrastructure protection into their own hands; this ultimately enhances layers of security and drives the growth in the market.
  • In February 2023, Northrop Grumman announced the start of integration and testing for its newly released ultra-wideband sensor, called the Electronically Scanned Multifunction Reconfigurable Integrated Sensor (EMRIS). According to Northrop Grumman, multifunction sensors in the future, such as EMRIS, give military personnel an opportunity to speed up the decision-making process and work collaboratively.

Considered in this report

  • Historic year: 2018
  • Base year: 2023
  • Estimated year: 2024
  • Forecast year: 2029

Aspects covered in this report

  • Critical Infrastructure Protection market Outlook with its value and forecast along with its segments
  • Various drivers and challenges
  • On-going trends and developments
  • Top profiled companies
  • Strategic recommendation

By Security Type

  • Physical Security & Safety
  • Cybersecurity

By Vertical

  • Energy & Power
  • BFSI
  • IT & Telecommunications
  • Government & Defence
  • Transport & Logistics
  • Oil & Gas
  • Other Verticals

By Offering

  • Solutions
  • Service

The approach of the report:

This report consists of a combined approach of primary and secondary research. Initially, secondary research was used to get an understanding of the market and list the companies that are present in it. The secondary research consists of third-party sources such as press releases, annual reports of companies, and government-generated reports and databases.

After gathering the data from secondary sources, primary research was conducted by conducting telephone interviews with the leading players about how the market is functioning and then conducting trade calls with dealers and distributors of the market. Post this; we have started making primary calls to consumers by equally segmenting them in regional aspects, tier aspects, age group, and gender. Once we have primary data with us, we can start verifying the details obtained from secondary sources.

Intended audience

This report can be useful to industry consultants, manufacturers, suppliers, associations, and organizations related to the Critical Infrastructure Protection industry, government bodies, and other stakeholders to align their market-centric strategies. In addition to marketing and presentations, it will also increase competitive knowledge about the industry.


This product will be delivered within 2 business days.

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Secondary Research
2.2. Primary Data Collection
2.3. Market Formation & Validation
2.4. Report Writing, Quality Check & Delivery
3. Market Structure
3.1. Market Considerate
3.2. Assumptions
3.3. Limitations
3.4. Abbreviations
3.5. Sources
3.6. Definitions
4. Economic/Demographic Snapshot
5. Global Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Outlook
5.1. Market Size by Value
5.2. Market Share by Region
5.3. Market Size and Forecast, by Security Type
5.4. Market Size and Forecast, by Vertical
5.5. Market Size and Forecast, by Offering
6. North America Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Outlook
6.1. Market Size by Value
6.2. Market Share by Country
6.3. Market Size and Forecast, by Security Type
6.4. Market Size and Forecast, by Vertical
6.5. Market Size and Forecast, by Offering
7. Market Dynamics
7.1. Market Drivers & Opportunities
7.2. Market Restraints & Challenges
7.3. Market Trends
7.4. COVID-19 Effect
7.5. Supply Chain Analysis
7.6. Policy & Regulatory Framework
7.7. Industry Experts Views
7.8. United States Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Outlook
7.8.1. Market Size by Value
7.8.2. Market Size and Forecast by Security Type
7.8.3. Market Size and Forecast by Vertical
7.8.4. Market Size and Forecast by Offering
7.9. Canada Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Outlook
7.9.1. Market Size by Value
7.9.2. Market Size and Forecast by Security Type
7.9.3. Market Size and Forecast by Vertical
7.9.4. Market Size and Forecast by Offering
7.10. Mexico Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Outlook
7.10.1. Market Size by Value
7.10.2. Market Size and Forecast by Security Type
7.10.3. Market Size and Forecast by Vertical
7.10.4. Market Size and Forecast by Offering
8. Competitive Landscape
8.1. Competitive Dashboard
8.2. Business Strategies Adopted by Key Players
8.3. Key Players Market Positioning Matrix
8.4. Porter's Five Forces
8.5. Company Profiles
8.5.1. Honeywell International Inc.
8.5.1.1. Company Snapshot
8.5.1.2. Company Overview
8.5.1.3. Financial Highlights
8.5.1.4. Geographic Insights
8.5.1.5. Business Segment & Performance
8.5.1.6. Product Portfolio
8.5.1.7. Key Executives
8.5.1.8. Strategic Moves & Developments
8.5.2. Secom Co., Ltd
8.5.3. Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
8.5.4. Cisco Systems, Inc
8.5.5. Hexagon AB
8.5.6. Telus Corporation
8.5.7. BAE Systems plc
8.5.8. NEC Corporation
8.5.9. Robert Bosch GmbH
8.5.10. International Business Machines Corporation
8.5.11. Microsoft Corporation
8.5.12. Fortinet, Inc.
9. Strategic Recommendations
10. Annexure
10.1. FAQ's
10.2. Notes
10.3. Related Reports
11. Disclaimer
List of Figures
Figure 1: Global Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size (USD Billion) by Region, 2023 & 2029
Figure 2: Market attractiveness Index, by Region 2029
Figure 3: Market attractiveness Index, by Segment 2029
Figure 4: Global Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size by Value (2018, 2023 & 2029F) (in USD Billion)
Figure 5: Global Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Share by Region (2023)
Figure 6: North America Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size by Value (2018, 2023 & 2029F) (in USD Billion)
Figure 7: North America Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Share by Country (2023)
Figure 8: US Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size by Value (2018, 2023 & 2029F) (in USD Billion)
Figure 9: Canada Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size by Value (2018, 2023 & 2029F) (in USD Billion)
Figure 10: Mexico Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size by Value (2018, 2023 & 2029F) (in USD Billion)
Figure 11: Competitive Dashboard of top 5 players, 2023
Figure 12: Porter's Five Forces of Global Critical Infrastructure Protection Market
List of Tables
Table 1: Global Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Snapshot, by Segmentation (2023 & 2029) (in USD Billion)
Table 2: Top 10 Counties Economic Snapshot 2022
Table 3: Economic Snapshot of Other Prominent Countries 2022
Table 4: Average Exchange Rates for Converting Foreign Currencies into U.S. Dollars
Table 5: Global Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size and Forecast, by Security Type (2018 to 2029F) (In USD Billion)
Table 6: Global Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size and Forecast, by Vertical (2018 to 2029F) (In USD Billion)
Table 7: Global Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size and Forecast, by Offering (2018 to 2029F) (In USD Billion)
Table 8: North America Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size and Forecast, by Security Type (2018 to 2029F) (In USD Billion)
Table 9: North America Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size and Forecast, by Vertical (2018 to 2029F) (In USD Billion)
Table 10: North America Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size and Forecast, by Offering (2018 to 2029F) (In USD Billion)
Table 11: Influencing Factors for Critical Infrastructure Protection Market, 2023
Table 12: United States Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size and Forecast by Security Type (2018 to 2029F) (In USD Billion)
Table 13: United States Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size and Forecast by Vertical (2018 to 2029F) (In USD Billion)
Table 14: United States Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size and Forecast by Offering (2018 to 2029F) (In USD Billion)
Table 15: Canada Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size and Forecast by Security Type (2018 to 2029F) (In USD Billion)
Table 16: Canada Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size and Forecast by Vertical (2018 to 2029F) (In USD Billion)
Table 17: Canada Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size and Forecast by Offering (2018 to 2029F) (In USD Billion)
Table 18: Mexico Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size and Forecast by Security Type (2018 to 2029F) (In USD Billion)
Table 19: Mexico Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size and Forecast by Vertical (2018 to 2029F) (In USD Billion)
Table 20: Mexico Critical Infrastructure Protection Market Size and Forecast by Offering (2018 to 2029F) (In USD Billion)

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • Honeywell International Inc.
  • Secom Co., Ltd
  • Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
  • Cisco Systems, Inc
  • Hexagon AB
  • Telus Corporation
  • BAE Systems plc
  • NEC Corporation
  • Robert Bosch GmbH
  • International Business Machines Corporation
  • Microsoft Corporation
  • Fortinet, Inc.