+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Solid-State Li-ion Batteries with Inorganic Solid Electrolytes Patent Landscape 2021

  • Report

  • 224 Pages
  • October 2021
  • Region: Global
  • Knowmade
  • ID: 5458521

Japanese companies have dominated the patent landscape, but the last 3 years have seen an explosion in Chinese patenting activity, while automakers and numerous pure-play newcomers are entering the game.

Report’s Key Features

  • PDF with > 200 slides
  • Excel file + Online database > 7,300 patent families
  • IP trends, including time-evolution of published patents, countries of patent filings, legal status, etc.
  • Ranking of main patent assignees.
  • Newcomers in the IP landscape.
  • Patent categorization by supply chain segments (electrolyte materials, electrodes, battery cells), type of electrolyte (inorganic, inorganic/polymer), and inorganic electrolyte materials (sulfide glass ceramics, Thio-LISICON, argyrodite, oxide glass ceramics, NASICON, perovskite, garnet, anti-perovskite, hydride)
  • For each segment: IP dynamics, ranking of main patent assignees, IP newcomers, key IP players, key patents, and recent developments.
  • Focus on patent portfolios of key players: Toyota, Samsung, LG Chem, Panasonic/Sanyo, Idemitsu Kosan, Fujifilm, Bosch/SEEO, Murata/Sony, Hyundai/Kia, Quantumscape, QingTao Energy Development, SVOLT, Ohara.
  • For each key player: Time-evolution of patenting activity, legal status of patents and countries of patent filings, patent segmentation by electrolyte material, IP strength by segments, key patents and recent IP developments.
  • Excel database containing all patents analyzed in the report, including technology, material segments, and hyperlinks to an updated online database.

Japanese players have a good IP position in the solid-state Li-ion battery field

Solid-state batteries with inorganic solid electrolytes hold a key position in the booming developments to get safer Li-ion batteries for electrical vehicles (EVs) with greater autonomy and maximum speed. Solid-state batteries can be classified into two categories: thin-film solid-state batteries and “bulk” solid-state batteries.

The thin-film technology approach proven for thin-film solid-state batteries is not directly applicable for bulk solid-state batteries. New processes and materials, therefore, have to be developed to get bulk solid-state batteries up to market requirements (performance, stability, cost).

There are currently three main axes for development to enhance bulk solid-state battery performance: improve solid electrolyte performances; improve the electrode/electrolyte interface, and develop material/cell assembly manufacturing processes compatible with industrial production.

Many companies have recently presented solid-state battery prototypes and announced their commercialization and integration in electric vehicles by 2025. However, many questions remain: which solid electrolyte has the most promising performance? What are the most recent technological developments? Who has the best position across the supply chain? In this context, the publisher is releasing a new patent landscape report covering the whole value chain of solid-state Li-ion batteries with inorganic solid electrolytes from electrolyte materials to electrodes and battery cells.

Patent landscape analysis is the perfect complement to market research, to fully comprehend the competitive landscape and technology roadmap, keep abreast of cutting-edge technology developments, anticipate future technology adoption, and understand the different competitors’ strategies. This kind of patent landscape report reveals the companies, technical solutions and strategies not identified through standard market analysis.

The publisher’s analysts have selected and analyzed more than 14,400 patent filings grouped into 7,300+ patent families (inventions) related to solid-state Li-ion batteries with inorganic solid electrolytes. In this report, the publisher reveals the main IP trends, key patented technologies, recent development trends, key IP players and newcomers, their strategies regarding inorganic solid electrolyte materials, and their IP strategies and strengths by supply chain segment and inorganic electrolyte material.

Understand the competitive landscape and IP strategy of key players

The publisher has identified more than 1,000 different entities that have filed patent applications related to inorganic-based solid-state Li-ion batteries. The report provides a clear overview of the most active patent assignees as well as a presentation of newcomers to the patent landscape.

Furthermore, patent segmentation reveals the IP position of patent assignees by supply chain segment (electrolyte materials, electrodes, battery cells) through a detailed analysis of their patent portfolios. The publisher also provides insights into the key players’ patented technologies, their IP strategy, and their ability to limit other firms’ patenting activity and/or freedom to operate.

The benchmarking of patent assignees is evaluated by supply chain segment, on the basis of their IP portfolio size, prior-art contribution, geographical coverage of the IP portfolio, and enforceability of their patents. A special focus is placed on the main IP collaborations (co-filings, license agreements, transfer of IP rights) related to solid-state Li-ion batteries with inorganic solid electrolytes.

Identify the leading IP players and IP newcomers across the supply chain, by electrolyte material

All patents selected for this study have been categorized by supply chain segment (electrolyte material, electrode, battery cells), electrolyte type (inorganic/polymer, inorganic) and inorganic electrolyte material (argyrodite, Thio-LISICON, sulfide glass-ceramic, oxide glass-ceramic, perovskite, anti-perovskite, LISICON, garnet, NASICON, hydride).

For each supply chain segment, this report includes a time-evolution of patent applications, main and key patent assignees, newcomers, and a description of key and recently patented technologies. An understanding of the current technical challenges addressed in the patents is also presented.

Focus on key players’ patent portfolios

The report provides a detailed analysis of a selection of key players: Toyota, Samsung, LG Chem, Panasonic/Sanyo, Idemitsu Kosan, Fujifilm, Bosch/SEEO, Murata/Sony, Hyundai/Kia, QuantumScape, QingTao Energy Development, SVOLT, and OHARA. For each player, the publisher summarizes their IP portfolio, highlight their strengths and weaknesses by segment, identify their key patents and provide information about their recent IP developments.

 

Useful Excel patent database

This report also includes an Excel database with the 7,300+ patent families (inventions) analyzed in this study. This useful patent database allows for multi-criteria searches and includes patent publication numbers, hyperlinks to an updated online database (original documents, legal status, etc.), priority date, title, abstract, patent assignees, patent’s current legal status, and segments (electrolyte materials, electrodes, battery cells, inorganic, inorganic/polymer, sulfide glass ceramics, Thio-LISICON, argyrodite, oxide glass ceramics, NASICON, perovskite, garnet, anti-perovskite, hydride, etc.).

 

Table of Contents


IntroductionScope and Objective of the ReportMethodologyHighlights
IP Landscape Overview
  • Time evolution of patent applications
  • Time Evolution of Patent publications
  • Time evolution of patent publications and main patent applicants
  • Time evolution of patent publications by country
  • Main Patent Assignees
  • Most active patent applicants since January 2020
  • Main patent assignees by company type
  • Main patent assignees by company type and corresponding number of patent families
  • Top assignee portfolios - Time evolution of patent publications
  • Main players entering the patent landscape in 2010-2015 period
  • Newcomers entering the patent landscape in 2016 and after
  • Big companies
  • Start-ups
  • Newcomers
  • Current legal status of patents
  • Mapping of main current patent holders
  • Geographical distribution of granted patents and pending patent applications
  • Geographical distribution of alive patents and main patent owners/applicants
  • Top assignees portfolios - Geographical coverage of IP portfolios
  • Geographical coverage of granted patents and pending patent applications
  • Top assignees portfolios - Main segments
  • Time evolution of patent publications by supply chain segment
  • Main patent assignees by supply chain segment
  • Ranking of main patent assignees by supply chain segment
  • Number of patent assignees by headquarters and typology
  • Noteworthy IP players by supply chain segment
  • Time evolution of patent publications by type of solid electrolyte
  • Main patent assignees by type of solid electrolyte
  • Main patent assignees by type of solid electrolyte
  • Cross-Matrix Supply Chain vs. Electrolytes / Electrolytes vs.
  • Inorganic Solid Electrolytes
Focus on Electrolyte Material
  • Main patent assignees
  • Newcomers
  • IP leadership of patent assignees
  • Key IP players
  • Patents split by inorganic electrolyte materials and related main patent assignees
  • Top assignees portfolios - Type of solid electrolytes
  • Patenting activity by type of solid electrolyte
  • Properties of each solid electrolytes category
  • Ionic conductivities of main inorganic solid electrolyte materials
  • Properties of main inorganic solid electrolyte materials
  • Key patents
  • Recent developments
Focus on Electrode
  • Main patent assignees
  • Newcomers
  • IP leadership of patent assignees
  • Key IP players
  • Main issues and solutions for Electrode/Electrolyte Interface
  • Key patents
  • Recent developments
  • Main patent assignees by supply chain segment
  • Ranking of main patent assignees by supply chain segment
  • Number of patent assignees by headquarters and typology
  • Noteworthy IP players by supply chain segment
  • Time evolution of patent publications by type of solid electrolyte
  • Main patent assignees by type of solid electrolyte
  • Main patent assignees by type of solid electrolyte
  • Cross-Matrix Supply Chain vs. Electrolytes / Electrolytes vs.
  • Inorganic Solid Electrolytes
Focus on Electrolyte Material
  • Main patent assignees
  • Newcomers
  • IP leadership of patent assignees
  • Key IP players
  • Patents split by inorganic electrolyte materials and related main patent assignees
  • Top assignees portfolios - Type of solid electrolytes
  • Patenting activity by type of solid electrolyte
  • Properties of each solid electrolytes category
  • Ionic conductivities of main inorganic solid electrolyte materials
  • Properties of main inorganic solid electrolyte materials
  • Key patents
  • Recent developments
Focus on Electrode
  • Main patent assignees
  • Newcomers
  • IP leadership of patent assignees
  • Key IP players
  • Main issues and solutions for Electrode/Electrolyte Interface
  • Key patents
  • Recent developments
Focus on Battery Cells
  • Main patent assignees
  • Newcomers
  • IP leadership of patent assignees
  • Key IP players
  • Main Large-scale production requirements
  • Conventional Lithium-ion battery production lines
  • Transferability of Existing Production Methods
  • Set-up of industrial production lines for bulk solid-state batteries
  • Main processes routes envisioned
  • Key patents
  • Recent developments
Focus on Key IP Players
  • Toyota, Samsung, LG Chem, Panasonic/Sanyo, Idemitsu Kosan, Fujifilm, Bosch/SEEO, Murata/Sony, Hyundai/Kia, Quantumscape, QingTao Energy Development, SVOLT, Ohara
  • For each key IP player:
    • Patent portfolio overview
    • Main IP collaborations and transfers
    • Matrix Electrolytes vs. Supply Chain
    • IP Technological segments - IP Dynamics
    • Key patented technologies
    • Main Recent developments
ConclusionTo Go FurtherPublisher Presentation

Companies Mentioned (Partial List)

A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:

  • AGC
  • Albemarle
  • Alps Electric
  • Amperex Technology/TDK
  • Asahi Kasei
  • BASF
  • Belenos Clean Power
  • Blue Solutions/Bolloré
  • Bosch/Seeo
  • BYD
  • CEA
  • CNRS
  • Daiso
  • DKS
  • Dow/Corning
  • FDK
  • Fujifilm
  • Fujitsu
  • Furukawa
  • FZ. Juelich
  • GLESI (Guilin Electrical Equipment Scientific Research Institute)
  • GS Yuasa
  • Hitachi Chemical
  • Hitachi Maxell
  • Honda
  • Honeycomb Energy
  • Huawei
  • Hydro Quebec
  • Hyundai/Kia
  • Idemitsu Kosan
  • Ionic Materials
  • Johnson Matthey
  • JSR
  • KAIST
  • LG Chem
  • Lionano
  • Lishen
  • Lithium Werks/Valence Technology
  • MIT
  • Mitsubishi Chemical
  • Mitsubishi Materials
  • Mitsui Chemicals
  • Murata/Sony
  • Nakajima Industry
  • NGK
  • NIAIST
  • NIMS
  • Nippon Chemical Industrial
  • Nippon Electric Glass
  • Nippon Shokubai
  • Nippon Soda
  • Nissan
  • NOF
  • Nohms Technologies
  • Ohara
  • Optimumnano Energy
  • Panasonic/Sanyo
  • Polyplus Battery
  • Qingtao Energy
  • Quantumscape
  • Saft/Total
  • Samsung Electronics
  • Samsung SDI
  • Schott
  • Seiko
  • Shin Etsu Chemical
  • Sila Nanotechnologies
  • Solid Power
  • Solvay
  • Sumita Optical Glass
  • Sumitomo Chemical
  • Sumitomo Metal Mining
  • Toho Titanium
  • Toray Industries
  • Toshiba
  • Toyota
  • Wildcat Discovery Technologies
  • Yuhuang Chemical
  • Zeon

Methodology

For patent landscape analysis, the patent information is extracted from the FamPat worldwide patent database (Questel-ORBIT) which provides 100+ million patent documents from 95 worldwide patent offices.

The search strategy combines keyword-based searches with expert review and manual screening of the patents. Keywords are searched in the title, abstract, claims and description. Relevant IPC (International Patent Classification) and CPC (Cooperative Patent Classification) are also used for the patent search. The dataset of identified patents is manually cleaned of non-relevant patents. Citing and cited patents of selected relevant patents are also included in the search strategy. The search strategy (keywords and search equations) and the dataset of selected patents is provided in our reports.

The publisher's analysts (PhD team) combine their technical and patent expertise with powerful analytics tools and proprietary methodologies to deliver the most relevant patent analyses.

 

 

 

 

Loading
LOADING...