+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Representing Clients on Wetlands Permits & Determinations Before Conservation Commissions

  • Training

  • 2 Hours
  • Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, Inc. (MCLE)
  • ID: 5866345
Learn about the substantive laws that govern your client’s applications, such as the: Wetlands Protection Act and municipal bylaws; Home Rule principles and preemption; Open Meeting Law rules (for live, remote, and hybrid); and related federal and state permits and licenses. Hear the expert faculty explain the procedural steps that determine your client’s outcomes, including filing applications, notifying abutters, conducting hearings, building a record, continuing hearings, navigating meeting deadlines, and appealing to a court and/or MassDEP. On the enforcement front, you learn about more complicated aspects, including noncompliance with permits, permit and plan amendments, certificates of compliance (often after the fact), site inspections, violation notices, and enforcement orders. In conclusion, the expert faculty analyze three critical cases limiting government regulation and enforcement over work and activities in or near wetlands, waterbodies, and wildlife habitats:

Boston Clear Water Company, LLC v. Town of Lynnfield, 100 Mass. App. Ct. 657 (2022), is the recent Appeals Court ruling that the Commission loses its Home Rule jurisdiction if the Commission fails to convene the public hearing by 21 days from the NOI being filed, so the only permit needed is from MassDEP.

Oyster Creek Preservation, Inc. v. Conservation Commission of Harwich, 449 Mass. 859 (2007), is the original SJC ruling that the Commission loses it Home Rule jurisdiction (and the applicant does not need the local bylaw or ordinance permit) if the Commission fails to issue its final permit or denial within 21 days of the close of the public hearing.

Town of Norton Conservation Commission v. Robert Pesa, 488 Mass. 325 (2021), is the seminal SJC case supporting a Commission, under the state Wetlands Protection Act, in a long-running attempt to get compliance from recalcitrant landowners, opening a three-year window (statute of repose) against each new landowner.

Course Content

9:30 - 9:50 am
Wetlands Permits & Determinations Before Conservation Commissions: Substantive Laws Governing Your Client’s Applications
Luke H. Legere, Esq.,
McGregor Legere & Stevens, PC, Boston

9:50 - 10:10 am
Wetlands Permits & Determinations Before Conservation Commissions: Tactical Pre-Filing Considerations
Sarah A. Turano-Flores, Esq.,
Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP, Hyannis

10:10 - 10:30 pm
Wetlands Permits & Determinations Before Conservation Commissions: Procedural Steps That Impact Your Client’s Outcomes
Richard A. Nylen, Jr., Esq.,
Lynch, DeSimone & Nylen LLP, Boston
Complicated Aspects on the Enforcement Front and Key Cases

10:30 - 10:45 am
Boston Clear Water Company, LLC v. Town of Lynnfield
Richard A. Nylen, Jr., Esq.,
Lynch, DeSimone & Nylen LLP, Boston

10:45 - 11:00 am
Oyster Creek Preservation, Inc. v. Conservation Commission of Harwich
Luke H. Legere, Esq.,
McGregor Legere & Stevens, PC, Boston

11:00 - 11:15 am
Town of Norton Conservation Commission v. Robert Pesa
Sarah A. Turano-Flores, Esq.,
Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP, Hyannis

11:15 - 11:30 am
'Ask the Experts' Q&A Session and Key Takeaways
Panel

Please Note
This webcast is delivered completely online, underscoring their convenience and appeal.
There are no published print materials. All written materials are available electronically only.
They are posted 24 hours prior to the program and can be accessed, downloaded, or printed from your computer.

Speakers

Chair
Gregor I. McGregor, Esq.,
McGregor Legere & Stevens, PC, Boston

Faculty
Luke H. Legere, Esq.,
McGregor Legere & Stevens, PC, Boston
Richard A. Nylen, Jr., Esq.,
Lynch, DeSimone & Nylen LLP, Boston
Sarah A. Turano-Flores, Esq.,
Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP, Hyannis