+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
New

Offshore Decommissioning Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, and Forecast, 2021-2031

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 186 Pages
  • January 2026
  • Region: Global
  • TechSci Research
  • ID: 5893370
Free Webex Call
10% Free customization
Free Webex Call

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

10% Free customization

This report comes with 10% free customization, enabling you to add data that meets your specific business needs.

The Global Offshore Decommissioning Market is projected to expand from USD 7.59 Billion in 2025 to USD 11.58 Billion by 2031, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 7.29%. This market encompasses the systematic procedure of safely plugging wells, dismantling platforms, and extracting subsea infrastructure once oil and gas production has concluded. Growth is primarily fuelled by the increasing volume of aging assets reaching the conclusion of their operational lifespans, alongside strict environmental regulations requiring full site restoration. Furthermore, operators are driven by the financial imperative to remove the continuing liability and maintenance expenditures linked to non-productive facilities.

A major obstacle hindering market growth is the high cost of complex removal operations, which frequently burdens operator budgets and stalls project implementation. Fluctuating commodity prices can further limit the capital accessible for these non-revenue-generating tasks, causing logistical and financial constraints. According to the North Sea Transition Authority, operators expended a record £2.4 billion on decommissioning activities in the UK sector in 2024, highlighting the vast financial scale necessary to manage legacy infrastructure.

Market Drivers

The aging of offshore infrastructure and asset maturation serves as a fundamental catalyst for the global market, with numerous platforms and subsea wells installed decades ago now surpassing their design life expectancies. This situation demands immediate action to avert structural failures and environmental risks, compelling operators to prioritize plugging and abandonment (P&A) campaigns over continued production improvements. The urgency is especially pronounced in mature basins where legacy assets are clustered and structural integrity poses increasing concerns. As stated in the 'Offshore Decommissioning Report 2024' by Offshore Energies UK in November 2024, the sector is anticipated to decommission slightly over 2,050 wells over the coming decade, indicating the critical volume of infrastructure requiring permanent isolation.

Additionally, stringent environmental regulations and compliance standards accelerate market momentum by legally requiring the total removal of facilities and seabed restoration to original conditions. Regulatory authorities are progressively enforcing strict liability frameworks to ensure operators, rather than taxpayers, shoulder the entire financial cost of remediation, transforming decommissioning from a discretionary choice into a mandatory compliance requirement. This regulatory environment drives significant capital allocation towards removal initiatives. For instance, Petrobras indicated in its 'Strategic Plan 2025-2029' in December 2024 that it plans to invest $9.9 billion in platform decommissioning through 2029. Reinforcing this trend of increasing expenditure, the North Sea Transition Authority noted in 2025 that operators estimated a commitment of £27 billion to decommissioning between 2023 and 2032, demonstrating the long-term financial dedication needed to satisfy these mandates.

Market Challenges

The immense expense linked to complex removal operations serves as a substantial constraint on the global offshore decommissioning market's expansion. Operators confront the significant financial load of funding these non-revenue-generating projects, which severely affects balance sheets and diminishes capital available for active development. The substantial costs associated with specialized heavy lift vessels and technical equipment often make these operations economically difficult, forcing companies to delay activities when feasible. This pattern of postponement results in a volatile workflow for the supply chain, preventing the market from achieving the consistent momentum necessary for steady growth.

The scale of this financial difficulty is underscored by recent industry projections demonstrating rising funding needs. According to 'Offshore Energies UK' in '2024', the sector is predicted to face a total expenditure of £24.6 billion by 2033 to manage the backlog of aging infrastructure. This massive projected spending highlights the intense pressure on operator budgets, which directly impedes the rate at which decommissioning projects receive approval and execution within the market.

Market Trends

The repurposing of offshore infrastructure for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) projects is transforming the market by converting retiring assets into vital elements of the energy transition. Rather than regarding aging platforms and pipelines exclusively as liabilities that demand costly removal, operators are increasingly preserving infrastructure for CO2 transport and storage to achieve net-zero targets. This strategic shift delays immediate abandonment expenses and establishes a secondary market for legacy facilities, effectively prolonging their economic lifespan. This trend is substantial; according to the 'Global Status of CCS 2024' report by the Global CCS Institute in October 2024, the global development pipeline for carbon capture and storage facilities increased by 60% year-on-year to 628 projects, directly fueling the demand for adaptable offshore assets.

Concurrently, the advancement of rigless Plug and Abandonment (P&A) technologies is gaining pace as operators aim to reduce the prohibitive costs linked to traditional heavy drilling units. The use of light well intervention vessels and wireline techniques allows for the permanent isolation of wells with considerably lower operational costs and shorter mobilization times than full-sized rigs. Adopting this technology is essential for sustaining project economics, especially since well work constitutes the primary financial weight in removal campaigns. As highlighted by the North Sea Transition Authority in the 'UKCS Decommissioning Cost and Performance Update 2024' in July 2024, well plugging and abandonment is predicted to account for roughly 50% of total decommissioning expenditure, requiring the widespread implementation of these cost-effective rigless solutions.

Key Players Profiled in the Offshore Decommissioning Market

  • Acteon Group
  • Aker Solutions
  • Allseas Group S.A.
  • Baker Hughes Company
  • DeepOcean Group Holding
  • Halliburton
  • Heerema Marine Contractors
  • Oceaneering International
  • Ramboll Group
  • Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V.

Report Scope

In this report, the Global Offshore Decommissioning Market has been segmented into the following categories:

Offshore Decommissioning Market, by Service:

  • Project Management
  • Engineering and Planning
  • Platform Preparation
  • Well Plugging and Abandonment
  • Platform Removal
  • Material Disposal
  • Site Clearance
  • Others

Offshore Decommissioning Market, by Structure:

  • Topside
  • Subsea Infrastructure
  • Substructure

Offshore Decommissioning Market, by Water Depth:

  • Shallow Water
  • Deep Water

Offshore Decommissioning Market, by Region:

  • North America
  • Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
  • South America
  • Middle East & Africa

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in the Global Offshore Decommissioning Market.

Available Customization

The analyst offers customization according to your specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:
  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).

This product will be delivered within 1-3 business days.

Table of Contents

1. Product Overview
1.1. Market Definition
1.2. Scope of the Market
1.2.1. Markets Covered
1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Objective of the Study
2.2. Baseline Methodology
2.3. Key Industry Partners
2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
2.5. Forecasting Methodology
2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
2.7. Assumptions and Limitations
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Overview of the Market
3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends
4. Voice of Customer
5. Global Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
5.1. Market Size & Forecast
5.1.1. By Value
5.2. Market Share & Forecast
5.2.1. By Service (Project Management, Engineering and Planning, Platform Preparation, Well Plugging and Abandonment, Platform Removal, Material Disposal, Site Clearance, Others)
5.2.2. By Structure (Topside, Subsea Infrastructure, Substructure)
5.2.3. By Water Depth (Shallow Water, Deep Water)
5.2.4. By Region
5.2.5. By Company (2025)
5.3. Market Map
6. North America Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
6.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.1.1. By Value
6.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.2.1. By Service
6.2.2. By Structure
6.2.3. By Water Depth
6.2.4. By Country
6.3. North America: Country Analysis
6.3.1. United States Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.3.1.1.1. By Value
6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.3.1.2.1. By Service
6.3.1.2.2. By Structure
6.3.1.2.3. By Water Depth
6.3.2. Canada Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.3.2.1.1. By Value
6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.3.2.2.1. By Service
6.3.2.2.2. By Structure
6.3.2.2.3. By Water Depth
6.3.3. Mexico Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.3.3.1.1. By Value
6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.3.3.2.1. By Service
6.3.3.2.2. By Structure
6.3.3.2.3. By Water Depth
7. Europe Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
7.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.1.1. By Value
7.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.2.1. By Service
7.2.2. By Structure
7.2.3. By Water Depth
7.2.4. By Country
7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
7.3.1. Germany Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.1.1.1. By Value
7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.1.2.1. By Service
7.3.1.2.2. By Structure
7.3.1.2.3. By Water Depth
7.3.2. France Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.2.1.1. By Value
7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.2.2.1. By Service
7.3.2.2.2. By Structure
7.3.2.2.3. By Water Depth
7.3.3. United Kingdom Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.3.1.1. By Value
7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.3.2.1. By Service
7.3.3.2.2. By Structure
7.3.3.2.3. By Water Depth
7.3.4. Italy Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.4.1.1. By Value
7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.4.2.1. By Service
7.3.4.2.2. By Structure
7.3.4.2.3. By Water Depth
7.3.5. Spain Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.5.1.1. By Value
7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.5.2.1. By Service
7.3.5.2.2. By Structure
7.3.5.2.3. By Water Depth
8. Asia-Pacific Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
8.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.1.1. By Value
8.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.2.1. By Service
8.2.2. By Structure
8.2.3. By Water Depth
8.2.4. By Country
8.3. Asia-Pacific: Country Analysis
8.3.1. China Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.1.1.1. By Value
8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.1.2.1. By Service
8.3.1.2.2. By Structure
8.3.1.2.3. By Water Depth
8.3.2. India Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.2.1.1. By Value
8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.2.2.1. By Service
8.3.2.2.2. By Structure
8.3.2.2.3. By Water Depth
8.3.3. Japan Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.3.1.1. By Value
8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.3.2.1. By Service
8.3.3.2.2. By Structure
8.3.3.2.3. By Water Depth
8.3.4. South Korea Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.4.1.1. By Value
8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.4.2.1. By Service
8.3.4.2.2. By Structure
8.3.4.2.3. By Water Depth
8.3.5. Australia Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.5.1.1. By Value
8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.5.2.1. By Service
8.3.5.2.2. By Structure
8.3.5.2.3. By Water Depth
9. Middle East & Africa Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
9.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.1.1. By Value
9.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.2.1. By Service
9.2.2. By Structure
9.2.3. By Water Depth
9.2.4. By Country
9.3. Middle East & Africa: Country Analysis
9.3.1. Saudi Arabia Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.3.1.1.1. By Value
9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.3.1.2.1. By Service
9.3.1.2.2. By Structure
9.3.1.2.3. By Water Depth
9.3.2. UAE Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.3.2.1.1. By Value
9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.3.2.2.1. By Service
9.3.2.2.2. By Structure
9.3.2.2.3. By Water Depth
9.3.3. South Africa Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.3.3.1.1. By Value
9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.3.3.2.1. By Service
9.3.3.2.2. By Structure
9.3.3.2.3. By Water Depth
10. South America Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
10.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.1.1. By Value
10.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.2.1. By Service
10.2.2. By Structure
10.2.3. By Water Depth
10.2.4. By Country
10.3. South America: Country Analysis
10.3.1. Brazil Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.3.1.1.1. By Value
10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.3.1.2.1. By Service
10.3.1.2.2. By Structure
10.3.1.2.3. By Water Depth
10.3.2. Colombia Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.3.2.1.1. By Value
10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.3.2.2.1. By Service
10.3.2.2.2. By Structure
10.3.2.2.3. By Water Depth
10.3.3. Argentina Offshore Decommissioning Market Outlook
10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.3.3.1.1. By Value
10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.3.3.2.1. By Service
10.3.3.2.2. By Structure
10.3.3.2.3. By Water Depth
11. Market Dynamics
11.1. Drivers
11.2. Challenges
12. Market Trends & Developments
12.1. Mergers & Acquisitions (If Any)
12.2. Product Launches (If Any)
12.3. Recent Developments
13. Global Offshore Decommissioning Market: SWOT Analysis
14. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
14.1. Competition in the Industry
14.2. Potential of New Entrants
14.3. Power of Suppliers
14.4. Power of Customers
14.5. Threat of Substitute Products
15. Competitive Landscape
15.1. Acteon Group
15.1.1. Business Overview
15.1.2. Products & Services
15.1.3. Recent Developments
15.1.4. Key Personnel
15.1.5. SWOT Analysis
15.2. Aker Solutions
15.3. Allseas Group S.A.
15.4. Baker Hughes Company
15.5. DeepOcean Group Holding
15.6. Halliburton
15.7. Heerema Marine Contractors
15.8. Oceaneering International
15.9. Ramboll Group
15.10. Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V.
16. Strategic Recommendations

Companies Mentioned

The key players profiled in this Offshore Decommissioning market report include:
  • Acteon Group
  • Aker Solutions
  • Allseas Group S.A.
  • Baker Hughes Company
  • DeepOcean Group Holding
  • Halliburton
  • Heerema Marine Contractors
  • Oceaneering International
  • Ramboll Group
  • Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V.

Table Information