Lawyers are not scientists, yet prosecutors, defense attorneys, and judges must assess, understand, and present science in many criminal cases. From the seemingly simple to the clearly complex, lawyers rely on 'experts' to bridge the gap between law and science. But the lawyer's job, which includes assessing the reliability and admissibility of scientific evidence, cannot be wholly delegated to an 'expert.' How can you equip yourself to evaluate scientific evidence in your cases?
Learn about the role of cognitive bias in every area of criminal forensics. You may already know about the concept of cognitive bias in forensic science generally, but this session highlights the extensive research that has been conducted in areas as varied as pathology, fingerprints, and mixture DNA. You also hear from prosecutors about approaches to forensic evidence, including measures that advance the use of valid forensics to solve crimes more quickly, ensure that invalid 'science' is not relied upon to secure convictions, and promote the provision of complete forensic discovery. Develop tools to challenge, confront, and prepare experts, no matter the subject. Get practical skills to better engage with the scientific issues that arise in your cases.
Have your questions ready-the panel wants to hear from you!
Learn about the role of cognitive bias in every area of criminal forensics. You may already know about the concept of cognitive bias in forensic science generally, but this session highlights the extensive research that has been conducted in areas as varied as pathology, fingerprints, and mixture DNA. You also hear from prosecutors about approaches to forensic evidence, including measures that advance the use of valid forensics to solve crimes more quickly, ensure that invalid 'science' is not relied upon to secure convictions, and promote the provision of complete forensic discovery. Develop tools to challenge, confront, and prepare experts, no matter the subject. Get practical skills to better engage with the scientific issues that arise in your cases.
Have your questions ready-the panel wants to hear from you!
Course Content
1:00 pm - 1:15 pmIntroduction
Radha Natarajan, Esq.,
New England Innocence Project, Boston
1:15 pm - 2:15 pm
Cognitive Bias in Forensic Science Across Disciplines
Jeffrey Kukucka,
Towson University, Towson
2:15 pm - 3:15 pm
The Prosecutor's Role in Ensuring Reliable Forensic Science at All Stages of a Case
Patricia J. Cummings, Esq.,
Supervisor, Conviction Integrity Unit, Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, Philadelphia
Carrie Wood, Esq.,
Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, Philadelphia
3:15 pm - 3:30 pm
Break
3:30 pm - 4:30 pm
Challenging, Confronting, and Preparing Experts
Ira L. Gant, Esq.,
Committee for Public Counsel Services, Brockton
4:30 pm - 5:00 pm
Q&A Session
Panel
Please Note
This webcast is delivered completely online, underscoring their convenience and appeal.
There are no published print materials. All written materials are available electronically only.
They are posted 24 hours prior to the program and can be accessed, downloaded, or printed from your computer.
Speakers
ChairRadha Natarajan, Esq.,
New England Innocence Project, Boston
Faculty
Patricia J. Cummings, Esq.,
Supervisor, Conviction Integrity Unit, Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, Philadelphia
Ira L. Gant, Esq.,
Committee for Public Counsel Services, Brockton
Jeffrey Kukucka,
Towson University, Towson
Carrie Wood, Esq.,
Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, Philadelphia
