+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market Report and Forecast 2024-2032

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 160 Pages
  • April 2024
  • Region: Global
  • Expert Market Research
  • ID: 5960384

Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market Overview

The soft tissue sarcoma market size is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.5% during the forecast period of 2024-2032. The major factors driving the market growth are the increasing incidence and prevalence of soft tissue sarcoma, the rising awareness and diagnosis of the disease, the development of novel and targeted therapies, and the increasing investment and funding for research and development. However, the market growth is hampered by the high cost and side effects of the treatments, the lack of specific biomarkers and screening tests, and the low survival rate of the patients.

Soft tissue sarcomas are rare malignant tumors that arise from the soft tissues of the body, such as fat, muscle, blood vessels, nerves, and connective tissues. They can occur in any part of the body, but most commonly affect the limbs, trunk, abdomen, and retroperitoneum.

Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market Drivers and Constraints

  • The increasing incidence and prevalence of soft tissue sarcoma is one of the key drivers of the market growth. According to the GLOBOCAN 2020, there were an estimated 42,500 new cases and 18,900 deaths from soft tissue sarcoma worldwide in 2020. The incidence rate of soft tissue sarcoma varies by region, with the highest rates in North America and Europe, and the lowest rates in Africa and Asia. The prevalence of soft tissue sarcoma is also increasing due to the improved survival of the patients with the advent of new therapies and supportive care.
  • The rising awareness and diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma is another key driver of the market growth. Soft tissue sarcoma is often misdiagnosed or overlooked due to its rarity and nonspecific symptoms. However, the awareness of the disease and its risk factors, such as genetic syndromes, radiation exposure, and chemical exposure, is increasing among the general public and the healthcare professionals. Moreover, the diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma is improving with the use of advanced imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and positron emission tomography (PET), and the availability of specialized pathology and molecular testing.
  • The development of novel and targeted therapies is a major driver of the market growth. The treatment of soft tissue sarcoma is challenging due to the heterogeneity and aggressiveness of the disease, the resistance to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and the limited options for metastatic or recurrent disease. However, the emergence of novel and targeted therapies, such as immunotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and gene therapy, has provided new hope and opportunities for the patients and the clinicians. These therapies have shown promising results in terms of efficacy, safety, and tolerability in various clinical trials and have received regulatory approvals or are in the pipeline for approval.
  • The increasing investment and funding for research and development is a significant driver of the market growth. The research and development of soft tissue sarcoma is supported by various public and private organizations, such as the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), the Sarcoma Foundation of America (SFA), and the Liddy Shriver Sarcoma Initiative.
  • The high cost and side effects of the treatments are the major constraints of the market growth. The treatment of soft tissue sarcoma is expensive and often requires multiple modalities, such as surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy. The cost of the treatment varies depending on the type, stage, and location of the tumor, the choice of the therapy, and the healthcare system of the country. The cost of the treatment can impose a significant financial burden on the patients and their families, as well as on the healthcare systems and the society. Moreover, the treatments of soft tissue sarcoma are associated with various side effects, such as nausea, vomiting, fatigue, hair loss, infection, bleeding, pain, nerve damage, lymphedema, and cardiotoxicity. These side effects can affect the quality of life and the compliance of the patients, as well as increase the risk of morbidity and mortality.
  • The lack of specific biomarkers and screening tests is another constraint of market growth. Soft tissue sarcoma is a heterogeneous and complex disease with multiple subtypes and molecular alterations. However, there are no specific biomarkers or screening tests that can accurately detect, diagnose, classify, or predict the prognosis or response to the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma. The current diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma relies on the histopathological and immunohistochemical examination of the tumor tissue, which can be subjective, inaccurate, or inconclusive. The lack of specific biomarkers and screening tests limits the early detection and prevention of the disease, as well as the development of personalized and precision medicine.
  • The low survival rate of the patients is a further constraint of the market growth. Soft tissue sarcoma is a highly aggressive and metastatic disease with a poor prognosis. The survival rate of the patients depends on various factors, such as the type, stage, and location of the tumor, the age and health of the patient, and the availability and effectiveness of the treatment. According to the SEER data, the 5-year relative survival rate of soft tissue sarcoma in the United States is 65% for localized disease, 44% for regional disease, and 18% for distant disease. The low survival rate of the patients reduces the demand and the market potential for the treatments, as well as the incentive and the feasibility of the research and development.

Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market Trends and Developments

The global soft tissue sarcoma market is witnessing significant growth, driven by increasing incidences of soft tissue sarcoma globally, advancements in medical treatments, and a growing awareness of the condition. The market is characterized by several key trends and developments that are shaping the landscape of diagnosis, treatment, and patient care in this sector.

Innovation in Therapeutics: There is a noticeable trend towards the innovation in therapeutics, including targeted therapies and immunotherapies. These new treatment modalities offer hope for improved survival rates and quality of life for patients with soft tissue sarcoma. Pharmaceutical companies and research institutions are investing heavily in R&D to explore and develop these advanced treatment options. This includes efforts to understand the genetic and molecular basis of various types of sarcomas to develop more effective and personalized treatment plans.

  • Diagnostic Advances: Advances in diagnostic technologies and methodologies are improving the early detection and characterization of soft tissue sarcomas. High-resolution imaging techniques, along with molecular and genetic testing, are becoming more prevalent. These advances facilitate more accurate diagnoses, enabling earlier and more targeted treatment interventions. Early diagnosis is critical in improving the prognosis for patients with soft tissue sarcoma.
  • Regulatory Approvals: The global soft tissue sarcoma market has seen an increase in regulatory approvals for new treatments and drugs. Regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) are recognizing the urgent need for new therapeutic options and are fast-tracking approval processes for promising drugs. This is encouraging for pharmaceutical companies and provides hope for patients seeking effective treatment options.
  • Global Health Initiatives: There is a growing emphasis on global health initiatives aimed at increasing awareness and improving treatment outcomes for soft tissue sarcoma. Collaborations between governments, healthcare organizations, and non-profits are focusing on research funding, patient education, and access to care. These initiatives are crucial for addressing disparities in treatment access and outcomes, especially in underserved populations.
  • Market Expansion and Challenges: The global soft tissue sarcoma market is expanding, with a notable increase in demand for treatments in emerging economies. However, the market faces challenges, including the high cost of new therapies and limited availability in some regions. Ensuring equitable access to advanced treatments remains a significant challenge that stakeholders are striving to address.
The global soft tissue sarcoma market is at a pivotal point, with significant opportunities for growth and improvement in patient outcomes. Ongoing research and development, coupled with collaborative efforts across sectors, are essential to overcoming existing challenges and leveraging the potential of new treatments and diagnostic tools. As the market evolves, keeping abreast of the latest trends and developments will be crucial for stakeholders involved in the care and treatment of soft tissue sarcoma.

Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market Segmentation

Market Breakup by Treatment Type

  • Radiation Therapy
  • Anti-Angiogenesis
  • Chemotherapy
  • Targeted Therapy
  • Others

Market Breakup by Route of Administration

  • Oral
  • Parenteral
  • Others

Market Breakup by End Users

  • Hospitals
  • Homecare
  • Specialty Clinics
  • Others

Market Breakup by Distribution Channel

  • Hospital Pharmacy
  • Retail Pharmacy
  • Online pharmacy
  • Others

Market Breakup by Region

  • United States
  • EU-4 and United Kingdom
  • Germany
  • France
  • Italy
  • Spain
  • Kingdom
  • Japan
  • India

Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market Competitive Landscape

The soft tissue sarcoma market is characterized by the presence of several global and regional players, who compete on the basis of product portfolio, price, quality, and innovation. Some of the key players in this market are Endo International PLC, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd, and Lupin, Aurobindo Pharma, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Merck & Co., Lilly, Bayer AG, Novartis AG, GlaxoSmithKline PLC, Pfizer Inc., Sanofi, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Mylan N.V., and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

Endo International PLC is a leading specialty pharmaceutical company that offers a range of products for pain management, oncology, urology, and endocrinology. The company has a strong presence in the US and Europe, and markets its products under various brands, such as XIAFLEX, OPANA, and PERCOCET.


This product will be delivered within 5-7 business days.

Table of Contents

1 Preface
1.1 Objectives of the Study
1.2 Key Assumptions
1.3 Report Coverage - Key Segmentation and Scope
1.4 Research Methodology
2 Executive Summary
3 Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market Overview - 8 Major Markets
3.1 Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market Historical Value (2017-2023)
3.2 Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market Forecast Value (2024-2032)
4 Soft Tissue Sarcoma Overview
4.1 Guidelines and Stages
4.2 Pathophysiology
4.3 Screening and Diagnosis
4.4 Therapy Pathway
5 Patient Profile
5.1 Patient Profile Overview
5.2 Patient Psychology and Emotional Impact Factors
5.3 Risk Assessment and Therapy Success Rate
6 Soft Tissue Sarcoma Epidemiology Scenario and Forecast - 8 Major Markets
6.1 8MM Epidemiology Scenario Overview (2017-2032)
6.2 United States Soft Tissue Sarcoma Epidemiology Forecast (2017-2032)
6.3 EU-4 and United Kingdom Soft Tissue Sarcoma Epidemiology Forecast (2017-2032)
6.3.1 Germany Soft Tissue Sarcoma Epidemiology Forecast (2017-2032)
6.3.2 France Soft Tissue Sarcoma Epidemiology Forecast (2017-2032)
6.3.3 Italy Soft Tissue Sarcoma Epidemiology Forecast (2017-2032)
6.3.4 Spain Soft Tissue Sarcoma Epidemiology Forecast (2017-2032)
6.3.5 United Kingdom Soft Tissue Sarcoma Epidemiology Forecast (2017-2032)
6.4 Japan Soft Tissue Sarcoma Epidemiology Forecast (2017-2032)
6.5 India Soft Tissue Sarcoma Epidemiology Forecast (2017-2032)
7 Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market Landscape-8 Major Markets
7.1 Soft Tissue Sarcoma Developers Landscape
7.1.1 Analysis by Year of Establishment
7.1.2 Analysis by Company Size
7.1.3 Analysis by Region
7.2 Soft Tissue Sarcoma Product Landscape
7.2.1 Analysis by Treatment Type
7.2.2 Analysis by Route of Administration
8 Soft Tissue Sarcoma Therapy Challenges and Unmet Needs
8.1 Therapy Pathway Challenges
8.2 Compliance and Drop-Out Analysis
8.3 Awareness and Prevention Gaps
9 Cost of Therapy
10 Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market Dynamics
10.1 Market Drivers and Constraints
10.2 SWOT Analysis
10.3 Porter’s Five Forces Model
10.4 Key Demand Indicators
10.5 Key Price Indicators
10.6 Industry Events, Initiatives, and Trends
10.7 Value Chain Analysis
11 Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market Segmentation-8 Major Markets
11.1 Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market (2017-2032) by Treatment Type
11.1.1 Market Overview
11.1.2 Radiation Therapy
11.1.3 Anti-Angiogenesis
11.1.4 Chemotherapy
11.1.5 Targeted Therapy
11.1.6 Others
11.2 Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market (2017-2032) by Route of Administration
11.2.1 Market Overview
11.2.2 Oral
11.2.3 Parenteral
11.2.4 Others
11.3 Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market (2017-2032) by End Users
11.3.1 Market Overview
11.3.2 Hospitals
11.3.3 Homecare
11.3.4 Specialty Clinics
11.3.5 Others
11.4 Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market (2017-2032) by Distribution Channel
11.4.1 Market Overview
11.4.2 Hospital Pharmacy
11.4.3 Retail Pharmacy
11.4.4 Online pharmacy
11.4.5 Others
11.5 Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market (2017-2032) by Region
11.5.1 Market Overview
11.5.2 United States
11.5.3 EU-4 and the United Kingdom
11.5.3.1 Germany
11.5.3.2 France
11.5.3.3 Italy
11.5.3.4 Spain
11.5.3.5 United Kingdom
11.5.4 Japan
11.5.5 India
12 United States Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market (2017-2032)
12.1 United States Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market Historical Value (2017-2023)
12.2 United States Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market Forecast Value (2024-2032)
12.3 United States Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market (2017-2032) by Treatment Type
12.3.1 Market Overview
12.3.2 Radiation Therapy
12.3.3 Anti-Angiogenesis
12.3.4 Chemotherapy
12.3.5 Targeted Therapy
12.3.6 Others
12.4 Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market (2017-2032) by Route of Administration
12.4.1 Market Overview
12.4.2 Oral
12.4.3 Parenteral
12.4.4 Others
13 EU-4 and United Kingdom Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market
13.1 EU-4 and United Kingdom Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market Historical Value (2017-2023)
13.2 EU-4 and United Kingdom Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market Forecast Value (2024-2032)
13.3 EU-4 and United Kingdom Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market Overview
13.4 EU-4 and United Kingdom Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market (2017-2032) by Treatment Type
13.4.1 Market Overview
13.4.2 Radiation Therapy
13.4.3 Anti-Angiogenesis
13.4.4 Chemotherapy
13.4.5 Targeted Therapy
13.4.6 Others
13.5 EU-4 and United Kingdom Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market (2017-2032) by Route of Administration
13.5.1 Market Overview
13.5.2 Oral
13.5.3 Parenteral
13.5.4 Others
14 Japan Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market
14.1 Japan Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market Historical Value (2017-2023)
14.2 Japan Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market Forecast Value (2024-2032)
14.3 Japan Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market (2017-2032) by Treatment Type
14.3.1 Market Overview
14.3.2 Radiation Therapy
14.3.3 Anti-Angiogenesis
14.3.4 Chemotherapy
14.3.5 Targeted Therapy
14.3.6 Others
14.4 Japan Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market (2017-2032) by Route of Administration
14.4.1 Market Overview
14.4.2 Oral
14.4.3 Parenteral
14.4.4 Others
15 India Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market
15.1 India Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market Historical Value (2017-2023)
15.2 India Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market Forecast Value (2024-2032)
15.3 India Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market (2017-2032) by Treatment Type
15.3.1 Market Overview
15.3.2 Radiation Therapy
15.3.3 Anti-Angiogenesis
15.3.4 Chemotherapy
15.3.5 Targeted Therapy
15.3.6 Others
15.4 India Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market (2017-2032) by Route of Administration
15.4.1 Market Overview
15.4.2 Oral
15.4.3 Parenteral
15.4.4 Others
16 Regulatory Framework
16.1 Regulatory Overview
16.1.1 US FDA
16.1.2 EU EMA
16.1.3 JAPAN PMDA
16.1.4 India CDSCO
16.1.5 Others
17 Patent Analysis
17.1 Analysis by Type of Patent
17.2 Analysis by Publication year
17.3 Analysis by Issuing Authority
17.4 Analysis by Patent Age
17.5 Analysis by CPC Analysis
17.6 Analysis by Patent Valuation
17.7 Analysis by Key Players
18 Grants Analysis
18.1 Analysis by year
18.2 Analysis by Amount Awarded
18.3 Analysis by Issuing Authority
18.4 Analysis by Grant Application
18.5 Analysis by Funding Institute
18.6 Analysis by NIH Departments
18.7 Analysis by Recipient Organization
19 Clinical Trials Analysis
19.1 Analysis by Trial Registration Year
19.2 Analysis by Trial Status
19.3 Analysis by Trial Phase
19.4 Analysis by Therapeutic Area
19.5 Analysis by Geography
20 Funding and Investment Analysis
20.1 Analysis by Funding Instances
20.2 Analysis by Type of Funding
20.3 Analysis by Funding Amount
20.4 Analysis by Leading Players
20.5 Analysis by Leading Investors
20.6 Analysis by Geography
21 Partnership and Collaborations Analysis
21.1 Analysis by Partnership Instances
21.2 Analysis by Type of Partnership
21.3 Analysis by Leading Players
21.4 Analysis by Geography
22 Supplier Landscape
22.1 Endo International PLC
22.1.1 Financial Analysis
22.1.2 Product Portfolio
22.1.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
22.1.4 Mergers and Acquisition
22.1.5 Certifications
22.2 Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd
22.2.1 Financial Analysis
22.2.2 Product Portfolio
22.2.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
22.2.4 Mergers and Acquisition
22.2.5 Certifications
22.3 Lupin
22.3.1 Financial Analysis
22.3.2 Product Portfolio
22.3.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
22.3.4 Mergers and Acquisition
22.3.5 Certifications
22.4 Aurobindo Pharma
22.4.1 Financial Analysis
22.4.2 Product Portfolio
22.4.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
22.4.4 Mergers and Acquisition
22.4.5 Certifications
22.5 Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
22.5.1 Financial Analysis
22.5.2 Product Portfolio
22.5.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
22.5.4 Mergers and Acquisition
22.5.5 Certifications
22.6 Merck & Co.
22.6.1 Financial Analysis
22.6.2 Product Portfolio
22.6.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
22.6.4 Mergers and Acquisition
22.6.5 Certifications
22.7 Lilly
22.7.1 Financial Analysis
22.7.2 Product Portfolio
22.7.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
22.7.4 Mergers and Acquisition
22.7.5 Certifications
22.8 Bayer AG
22.8.1 Financial Analysis
22.8.2 Product Portfolio
22.8.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
22.8.4 Mergers and Acquisition
22.8.5 Certifications
22.9 Novartis AG
22.9.1 Financial Analysis
22.9.2 Product Portfolio
22.9.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
22.9.4 Mergers and Acquisition
22.9.5 Certifications
22.10 GlaxoSmithKline PLC
22.10.1 Financial Analysis
22.10.2 Product Portfolio
22.10.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
22.10.4 Mergers and Acquisition
22.10.5 Certifications
22.11 Pfizer Inc
22.11.1 Financial Analysis
22.11.2 Product Portfolio
22.11.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
22.11.4 Mergers and Acquisition
22.11.5 Certifications
22.12 Sanofi
22.12.1 Financial Analysis
22.12.2 Product Portfolio
22.12.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
22.12.4 Mergers and Acquisition
22.12.5 Certifications
22.13 Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
22.13.1 Financial Analysis
22.13.2 Product Portfolio
22.13.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
22.13.4 Mergers and Acquisition
22.13.5 Certifications
22.14 Mylan N.V.
22.14.1 Financial Analysis
22.14.2 Product Portfolio
22.14.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
22.14.4 Mergers and Acquisition
22.14.5 Certifications
22.15 F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
22.15.1 Financial Analysis
22.15.2 Product Portfolio
22.15.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
22.15.4 Mergers and Acquisition
22.15.5 Certifications
List not exhaustive
23 Soft Tissue Sarcoma Market - Distribution Model (Additional Insight)
23.1 Overview
23.2 Potential Distributors
23.3 Key Parameters for Distribution Partner Assessment
24 Key Opinion Leaders (KOL) Insights (Additional Insight)
25 Company Competitiveness Analysis (Additional Insight)
25.1 Very Small Companies
25.2 Small Companies
25.3 Mid-Sized Companies
25.4 Large Companies
25.5 Very Large Companies
26 Payment Methods (Additional Insight)
26.1 Government Funded
26.2 Private Insurance
26.3 Out-of-Pocket
*Additional insights provided are customisable as per client requirements.
* The coverage of the Market Landscape section depends on the data availability and may cover a minimum of 80% of the total market. The research team strives to make this section as comprehensive as possible.

Companies Mentioned

  • Endo International PLC
  • Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd
  • Lupin
  • Aurobindo Pharma
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
  • Merck & Co.
  • Lilly
  • Bayer AG
  • Novartis AG
  • GlaxoSmithKline PLC
  • Pfizer Inc
  • Sanofi
  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
  • Mylan N.V.
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

Methodology

Loading
LOADING...