+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Understanding Attorneys' Obligations Regarding Title Insurance Roles

  • Training

  • 2 Hours
  • Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, Inc. (MCLE)
  • ID: 5971732

In a December 15, 2022, article on the Office of Bar Counsel website, it was submitted that providing title insurance in connection with a real estate closing is subject to Rule 1.8(a) of the Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct. The practical implications of this interpretation of the rule are that:

  • The terms of the transaction must be fully disclosed in an understandable manner to the client in writing.
  • The client must be advised in writing sufficiently in advance of the closing of the desirability of seeking the advice of independent legal counsel and given a reasonable opportunity to do so.
  • The client must give “informed consent” in writing to the “essential terms of the transaction” and the lawyer’s role “including whether the lawyer is representing the client in the transaction.” In the view of Bar Counsel, the “essential terms of the transaction” include disclosure of the portion of the title premium received by the attorney.

The March 7, 2023, issue of the BBO Sign Posts newsletter cautions that:

“Whether it’s the sale of title insurance or any other business transaction with a client, lawyers who fail to comply with the disclosure and consent provisions of Mass. R. Prof. C 1.8(a) risk disciplinary action. Among other things, Rule 1.8 requires that the terms of the transaction be objectively fair and reasonable, that lawyers make full disclosure of the terms in writing, that they advise the client of the desirability of seeking independent legal counsel, and that they obtain the client’s informed consent in writing.”

Attend to hear a moderated dialogue between Assistant Bar Counsel and a seasoned conveyancer dissecting the implications of this interpretation.

Course Content

12:00 - 12:25 pm - Overview of Rules 1.5, 1.7, 1.8 and 5.7 of the Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct

Robert M. Daniszewski, Esq.,
Office of Bar Counsel, Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers, Boston

12:25 - 12:40 pm - 1.7 and the Role of the Lawyer

Conrad J. Bletzer, Jr., Esq.,
Bletzer & Bletzer, PC, Brighton

12:40 - 12:55 pm - How the Interplay Between the Ethical Rules Affects Conveyancers

Conrad J. Bletzer, Jr., Esq.,
Bletzer & Bletzer, PC, Brighton

12:55 - 1:05 pm - Requirements of Disclosure in Initial Fee Agreement

Conrad J. Bletzer, Jr., Esq.,
Bletzer & Bletzer, PC, Brighton

1:05 - 1:20 pm - Requirements of Obtaining Informed Consent from the Client in a Signed Written Document

Conrad J. Bletzer, Jr., Esq.,
Bletzer & Bletzer, PC, Brighton

Robert M. Daniszewski, Esq.,
Office of Bar Counsel, Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers, Boston

1:20 - 1:50 pm - Hypotheticals and Stories From the Trenches

1:50 - 2:00 pm - 'Ask the Experts' Q&A Session and Key Takeaways

Please Note
This webcast is delivered completely online, underscoring the convenience and appeal.
There are no published print materials. All written materials are available electronically only.
They are posted 24 hours prior to the program and can be accessed, downloaded, or printed from your computer.

Speakers

Chair

Hon. Bonnie H. MacLeod
Superior Court, Commonwealth of Massachusetts (Ret.); JAMS, Boston

Faculty

Conrad J. Bletzer, Jr., Esq.
Bletzer & Bletzer, PC, Brighton

Robert M. Daniszewski, Esq.
Office of Bar Counsel, Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers, Boston