+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Radiology As A Service Market - Global Industry Size, Share, Trends, Opportunity, & Forecast, 2019-2029F

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 180 Pages
  • May 2024
  • Region: Global
  • TechSci Research
  • ID: 5972965
Free Webex Call
10% Free customization
Free Webex Call

Speak directly to the analyst to clarify any post sales queries you may have.

10% Free customization

This report comes with 10% free customization, enabling you to add data that meets your specific business needs.

Global Radiology as a Service Market was valued at USD 3.95 Billion in 2023 and is anticipated to project steady growth in the forecast period with a CAGR of 10.95% through 2029. Radiology as a Service (RaaS) refers to a healthcare model in which medical imaging and radiology services are outsourced to external providers through a cloud-based platform or service. In essence, RaaS allows healthcare institutions, clinics, and healthcare professionals to access radiological expertise, image interpretation, reporting, and related services remotely, often via the internet. This model offers various benefits, including increased efficiency, access to subspecialty expertise, and cost-effectiveness. Technological innovations, such as cloud computing, high-speed internet, and improved image transfer capabilities, have enabled the efficient storage, sharing, and interpretation of medical images, driving the adoption of RaaS. The expansion of telemedicine services and remote healthcare models has increased the need for remote interpretation and reporting of medical images, creating a strong demand for RaaS solutions.

Key Market Drivers

Subspecialty Reporting & Collaboration

Subspecialty radiologists have specialized knowledge and expertise in specific areas of medical imaging, such as neuroradiology, musculoskeletal imaging, cardiac imaging, and more. By accessing subspecialty expertise through RaaS platforms, healthcare providers can ensure more accurate and precise diagnoses, especially for complex cases. Some medical conditions and imaging studies are relatively rare, and local healthcare facilities might not have dedicated subspecialists on staff. RaaS platforms enable these facilities to connect with remote subspecialty radiologists who can provide valuable insights and interpretations. RaaS allows for comprehensive patient care by providing access to radiologists with expertise in different subspecialties. This is particularly important for conditions that require multi-disciplinary approaches and consultations. Healthcare professionals can seek second opinions and peer reviews from subspecialty radiologists through RaaS. This ensures that critical decisions are well-informed and supported by expert insights.

RaaS platforms facilitate collaboration between radiologists across geographic boundaries. Subspecialists from different regions can collaborate on cases, contributing to more comprehensive and accurate diagnoses. Subspecialty radiologists who are available through RaaS platforms can help reduce turnaround times for complex cases. Faster access to specialized interpretations can lead to quicker treatment decisions and improved patient outcomes. Healthcare facilities can optimize their resources by outsourcing subspecialty interpretations through RaaS. This eliminates the need to employ full-time subspecialists for specific cases, reducing costs while maintaining high-quality care. RaaS platforms provide opportunities for less experienced radiologists to learn from subspecialty experts. This educational aspect contributes to professional development within the radiology field. Subspecialty radiologists working through RaaS platforms can gain exposure to a wide range of cases from different regions. This diverse experience can contribute to their expertise and improve their ability to handle complex scenarios. The ability to access subspecialty reporting and collaboration through RaaS platforms offers a range of benefits to healthcare providers, patients, and radiologists alike. This factor will help in the development of Global Radiology as a Service Market.

Advancements in Technology

AI and ML technologies are being integrated into RaaS platforms to assist radiologists in image interpretation. AI algorithms can identify patterns, anomalies, and potential abnormalities in medical images, supporting radiologists in making accurate diagnoses. Deep learning algorithms, a subset of AI, have shown promising results in image recognition tasks. Neural networks can be trained to recognize specific features in medical images, aiding in the detection of diseases and conditions. Advancements in automated image analysis software enable the automatic extraction of quantitative data from medical images. This data can provide valuable insights into disease progression, treatment effectiveness, and patient outcomes. Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques are used to extract structured information from radiology reports, making it easier to analyze and index data for research, quality improvement, and decision-making. Complex image processing tasks require significant computing power. High-performance computing systems enhance the speed and accuracy of image analysis, particularly when dealing with large datasets. Advanced visualization tools enable the creation of 3D reconstructions and detailed visualizations from medical imaging data. This is valuable for complex surgical planning, treatment evaluation, and education.

Mobile apps and platforms allow healthcare professionals to access medical images and reports on smartphones and tablets, enabling remote consultations and timely decision-making. Blockchain has the potential to enhance data security and integrity in medical imaging. It can be used to track and verify the authenticity of images and reports while maintaining patient privacy. Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) technologies are being explored for immersive medical imaging visualization, training, and preoperative planning. Seamless integration between RaaS platforms and EHR systems ensures that radiology reports and images are readily available to healthcare providers within the patient's medical record. Improved network speeds and connectivity enable faster transfer of large medical image files, reducing the time required to access and analyze images remotely. Advanced secure communication tools enable real-time interaction between radiologists and referring physicians, facilitating discussions about diagnoses and treatment plans. These technological advancements are driving the evolution of the RaaS market, enhancing the capabilities of radiologists, improving patient care, and expanding the reach of radiology services globally. This factor will pace up the demand of Global Radiology as a Service Market.

Rising Demand of Cloud-based Solutions

Cloud-based solutions refer to software applications, services, and resources that are hosted on remote servers and delivered over the internet. These solutions offer various benefits, such as scalability, accessibility, cost-efficiency, and flexibility. In the context of the healthcare industry, including the Global Radiology as a Service (RaaS) market, cloud-based solutions have become increasingly relevant and impactful. Cloud-based solutions provide on-demand access to resources, applications, and services over the internet. This eliminates the need for local installations and allows users to access the system from anywhere with an internet connection.

Cloud solutions can easily scale up or down based on demand. This is particularly important in healthcare where image storage and processing needs can vary significantly. Cloud-based solutions often follow a subscription-based model, which reduces upfront costs and allows organizations to pay only for the resources they use. This can be more cost-effective than building and maintaining in-house infrastructure. Users can access cloud-based solutions from various devices, enabling remote work, collaboration, and easy data sharing. This is especially useful for healthcare professionals who need to access patient data and images from different locations. Cloud solutions usually include robust data backup and recovery mechanisms, ensuring that healthcare data, including medical images, are securely stored, and can be restored in case of emergencies. Cloud-based platforms can store and manage vast amounts of medical imaging data, including X-rays, MRIs, CT scans, and more. This makes it easier for healthcare institutions to store and access patient images securely.

Radiologists can remotely access medical images, collaborate with peers, and provide diagnostic reports through cloud-based solutions. This is particularly beneficial for teleradiology and telemedicine services. Cloud-based solutions offer the computational power required for AI and machine learning algorithms to analyze medical images and assist in diagnostics. These technologies can enhance the accuracy and efficiency of radiological interpretations. Cloud-based solutions can integrate with electronic health record (EHR) systems, allowing seamless data exchange between radiology reports and patient records Cloud solutions eliminate the need for healthcare institutions to manage and maintain complex IT infrastructure, freeing up resources for core medical activities. Cloud-based solutions can be deployed quickly compared to traditional on-premises systems, allowing healthcare providers to adapt to changing needs and trends more easily. This factor will accelerate the demand of Global Radiology as a Service Market.

Key Market Challenges

Interpretation Accuracy

While Radiology as a Service offers numerous benefits, ensuring accurate and reliable interpretations of medical images remains a critical concern. Some medical cases require specialized knowledge and experience to interpret accurately. RaaS platforms need to ensure access to subspecialty radiologists or mechanisms to handle complex cases effectively. Integrating AI and machine learning algorithms in RaaS platforms requires balancing the capabilities of automation with the expertise of human radiologists. Ensuring the accuracy of AI-assisted interpretations is a challenge. Accurate interpretation depends on the quality of medical images. Challenges related to image resolution, artifacts, and image acquisition techniques can impact interpretation accuracy.

Different patients and imaging modalities can result in varying presentations of the same condition. Radiologists need to account for these variations to provide accurate interpretations. Remote radiologists may have limited access to the patient's complete medical history or physical examination findings, which can affect the accuracy of interpretations. Providing access to subspecialty radiologists through RaaS platforms can enhance accuracy for specialized cases that require specific expertise. Effective communication between remote radiologists and referring physicians is crucial for clarifying findings and discussing complex cases, contributing to accurate diagnoses.

Cost Considerations

Implementing Radiology as a Service (RaaS) solutions may involve initial setup costs, including integration with existing systems, training, and onboarding of radiologists. Implementing RaaS solutions may involve initial setup costs, including integration with existing systems, training, and onboarding of radiologists. RaaS services are often charged on a per-study or per-case basis. The accumulation of these fees can impact the overall operational budget of healthcare institutions. Healthcare institutions experience varying imaging study volumes. Balancing costs with fluctuating workloads can be challenging.

Calculating the return on investment (ROI) for adopting RaaS solutions can be complex due to factors like improved patient outcomes, reduced turnaround times, and potential cost savings. Integrating RaaS platforms with existing electronic health record (EHR) systems and workflows may require investments in integration tools and resources. Conduct a thorough cost-benefit analysis to evaluate the potential savings, operational efficiencies, and improved patient outcomes associated with RaaS adoption. Analyze historical case volumes and trends to predict usage patterns and negotiate pricing plans with RaaS providers. RaaS can streamline workflows and reduce administrative burdens, contributing to operational efficiency and potential cost savings.

Key Market Trends

Growing Emphasis on Data Security and Privacy

Healthcare data is subject to various regulations, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in the United States and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union. RaaS providers need to adhere to these regulations to ensure patient data security and privacy. Patient Health Information (PHI) must be safeguarded according to HIPAA regulations. RaaS platforms must implement strict security measures to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of patient data. RaaS platforms need to ensure secure transmission of medical images and reports over networks. Encryption and secure communication protocols are essential to prevent unauthorized access during data transfer.

Data stored on RaaS platforms should be encrypted to prevent unauthorized access even in the event of a security breach. This includes data at rest and data in transit. Implementing multi-factor authentication adds an extra layer of security by requiring multiple forms of verification for user access. RaaS platforms should maintain audit trails to track and monitor who accessed patient data, when, and for what purpose. This helps in identifying any unauthorized access. Healthcare institutions should assess the security practices of RaaS vendors before engaging in their services. This includes evaluating their data protection measures and compliance with relevant regulations.

Segmental Insights

Service Insights

Based on service, the tele-radiology reading platform services emerged as the dominating segment in the Global Radiology as a Service Market in 2023. The segment's expansion is driven by the increasing need for medical imaging services due to the prevalence of chronic conditions, including cancer, cardiovascular disease, and brain injury. Tele-radiology read platform services provide remote imaging solutions that enable radiologists to carry out remote reading and deliver quality patient care. Tele-radiology platforms enable radiologists to provide their expertise across geographical boundaries. This can be especially valuable for areas with limited access to radiology specialists.

Modality Insights

Based on modality, the global radiology as a service market was dominated by X-ray segment and is predicted to continue expanding over the coming years. X-ray imaging is one of the most common and widely used medical imaging modalities. It's often the first imaging technique used in many clinical scenarios, making it a fundamental part of healthcare diagnostics. X-rays are often used for urgent and immediate medical needs, such as evaluating bone fractures or identifying issues in the chest. Quick access to radiology interpretations through RaaS could be crucial for timely patient care.

End User Insights

Based on end user, hospitals emerged as the fastest growing segment in global radiology as a service market during the forecast period. The development of healthcare infrastructure and the expansion of government initiatives have enabled healthcare facilities to expand to remote locations. Hospitals typically have access to substantial financial resources, which enable them to create a dedicated radiology department that is composed of the most cutting-edge systems and solutions, thus enabling them to maintain patient retention through enhanced patient care.

Regional Insights

Based on region, North America dominated the Global Radiology as a Service Market in 2023. The North America region, particularly the United States, has emerged as the dominant force in the global radiology as a service (RaaS) market, leading the charge in technological innovation and healthcare infrastructure advancement. With a well-developed healthcare ecosystem comprising numerous medical facilities, hospitals, and imaging centers, North America offers an ideal environment for the adoption and integration of cutting-edge technologies like RaaS. The region's longstanding commitment to technological innovation has propelled it to the forefront of healthcare advancements, with a particular emphasis on leveraging cloud-based solutions and telemedicine - both integral components of RaaS platforms. This proactive approach to embracing digital transformation has positioned North America as a hub for healthcare innovation, attracting RaaS providers seeking to capitalize on the region's readiness to embrace modern healthcare delivery models.

The sheer size of the North American market, coupled with its high demand for healthcare services, presents an attractive opportunity for RaaS providers to establish a strong presence and expand their offerings. The region's large population and substantial healthcare expenditures underscore its significance as a lucrative market for RaaS solutions, driving robust growth and fostering continued innovation in the radiology sector. North America's leadership in the global RaaS market is a testament to its progressive healthcare landscape, technological prowess, and commitment to advancing patient care through innovative solutions. As the region continues to embrace digital healthcare transformation, RaaS is poised to play an increasingly vital role in enhancing radiology services and improving patient outcomes across North America and beyond.

Key Market Players

  • The Radiology Group LLC
  • Enlitic, Inc.
  • Medica Reporting Ltd.
  • OnRad, Inc.
  • Nano-x Imaging Ltd.
  • TeleDiagnosys Services Pvt Ltd.
  • Fovia, Inc.
  • HealthLevel, Inc.
  • Lucid Health, Inc.
  • medQ, Inc.

Report Scope:

In this report, the Global Radiology as a Service Market has been segmented into the following categories, in addition to the industry trends which have also been detailed below:

Radiology as a Service Market, By Service:

  • Tele-radiology Reading Platform Services
  • Cloud-based Reading Platform Services
  • Web-based Reading Platform Services
  • 3D Lab Imaging Services
  • Remote Scanning Services
  • Consulting Services
  • Staffing Services
  • Staffing services for radiologists
  • Staffing services for radiographers
  • Other IT Services
  • Patient arrival and registration
  • Workflow scheduling and data entry
  • Documentation
  • Image acquisition
  • Diagnosis and reporting
  • Information exchange
  • Billing services
  • Coding, billing, and working denials
  • Reimbursement from payers

Radiology as a Service Market, By Location:

  • Inshore
  • Offshore
  • In-house

Radiology as a Service Market, By Modality:

  • X-ray
  • CT
  • MRI
  • Ultrasound
  • Mammography
  • PET-CT

Radiology as a Service Market, By End User:

  • Hospitals
  • Diagnostic Imaging Centers
  • Radiology Clinics
  • Physician Offices
  • Nursing Homes

Radiology as a Service Market, By Region:

  • North America
  • United States
  • Canada
  • Mexico
  • Asia Pacific
  • China
  • India
  • South Korea
  • Australia
  • Japan
  • Europe
  • Germany
  • France
  • United Kingdom
  • Spain
  • Italy
  • South America
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Colombia
  • Middle East & Africa
  • South Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • UAE

Competitive Landscape

Company Profiles: Detailed analysis of the major companies present in Global Radiology as a Service Market.

Available Customizations:

Global Radiology as a Service Market report with the given market data, the publisher offers customizations according to a company's specific needs. The following customization options are available for the report:

Company Information

  • Detailed analysis and profiling of additional market players (up to five).


This product will be delivered within 1-3 business days.

Table of Contents

1. Service Overview
1.1. Market Definition
1.2. Scope of the Market
1.2.1. Markets Covered
1.2.2. Years Considered for Study
1.2.3. Key Market Segmentations
2. Research Methodology
2.1. Objective of the Study
2.2. Baseline Methodology
2.3. Key Industry Partners
2.4. Major Association and Secondary Sources
2.5. Forecasting Methodology
2.6. Data Triangulation & Validation
2.7. Assumptions and Limitations
3. Executive Summary
3.1. Overview of the Market
3.2. Overview of Key Market Segmentations
3.3. Overview of Key Market Players
3.4. Overview of Key Regions/Countries
3.5. Overview of Market Drivers, Challenges, Trends
4. Voice of Customer
5. Global Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
5.1. Market Size & Forecast
5.1.1. By Value
5.2. Market Share & Forecast
5.2.1. By Service (Tele-radiology Reading Platform Services {Cloud-based Reading Platform Services, Web-based Reading Platform Services, 3D Lab Imaging Services}, Remote Scanning Services, Consulting Services, Staffing Services {Staffing services for radiologists, Staffing services for radiographers}, Other IT Services {Patient arrival and registration, Workflow Scheduling And Data Entry}, Documentation {Image acquisition, Diagnosis and reporting, Information exchange}, Billing services {Coding, billing, and working denials, Reimbursement from payers})
5.2.2. By Location (Inshore, Offshore, In-house)
5.2.3. By Modality (X-ray, CT, MRI, Ultrasound, Mammography, PET-CT)
5.2.4. By End User (Hospitals, Diagnostic Imaging Centers, Radiology Clinics, Physician Offices, Nursing Homes)
5.2.5. By Company (2023)
5.2.6. By Region
5.3. Market Map
6. North Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
6.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.1.1. By Value
6.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.2.1. By Service
6.2.2. By Location
6.2.3. By Modality
6.2.4. By End User
6.2.5. By Country
6.3. North America: Country Analysis
6.3.1. United States Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
6.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.3.1.1.1. By Value
6.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.3.1.2.1. By Service
6.3.1.2.2. By Location
6.3.1.2.3. By Modality
6.3.1.2.4. By End User
6.3.2. Mexico Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
6.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.3.2.1.1. By Value
6.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.3.2.2.1. By Service
6.3.2.2.2. By Location
6.3.2.2.3. By Modality
6.3.2.2.4. By End User
6.3.3. Canada Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
6.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
6.3.3.1.1. By Value
6.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
6.3.3.2.1. By Service
6.3.3.2.2. By Location
6.3.3.2.3. By Modality
6.3.3.2.4. By End User
7. Europe Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
7.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.1.1. By Value
7.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.2.1. By Service
7.2.2. By Location
7.2.3. By Modality
7.2.4. By End User
7.2.5. By Country
7.3. Europe: Country Analysis
7.3.1. France Radiology as a Service Outlook
7.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.1.1.1. By Value
7.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.1.2.1. By Service
7.3.1.2.2. By Location
7.3.1.2.3. By Modality
7.3.1.2.4. By End User
7.3.2. Germany Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
7.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.2.1.1. By Value
7.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.2.2.1. By Service
7.3.2.2.2. By Location
7.3.2.2.3. By Modality
7.3.2.2.4. By End User
7.3.3. United Kingdom Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
7.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.3.1.1. By Value
7.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.3.2.1. By Service
7.3.3.2.2. By Location
7.3.3.2.3. By Modality
7.3.3.2.4. By End User
7.3.4. Italy Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
7.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.4.1.1. By Value
7.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.4.2.1. By Service
7.3.4.2.2. By Location
7.3.4.2.3. By Modality
7.3.4.2.4. By End User
7.3.5. Spain Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
7.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
7.3.5.1.1. By Value
7.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
7.3.5.2.1. By Service
7.3.5.2.2. By Location
7.3.5.2.3. By Modality
7.3.5.2.4. By End User
8. Asia Pacific Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
8.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.1.1. By Value
8.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.2.1. By Service
8.2.2. By Location
8.2.3. By Modality
8.2.4. By End User
8.2.5. By Country
8.3. Asia Pacific: Country Analysis
8.3.1. China Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
8.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.1.1.1. By Value
8.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.1.2.1. By Service
8.3.1.2.2. By Location
8.3.1.2.3. By Modality
8.3.1.2.4. By End User
8.3.2. India Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
8.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.2.1.1. By Value
8.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.2.2.1. By Service
8.3.2.2.2. By Location
8.3.2.2.3. By Modality
8.3.2.2.4. By End User
8.3.3. South Korea Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
8.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.3.1.1. By Value
8.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.3.2.1. By Service
8.3.3.2.2. By Location
8.3.3.2.3. By Modality
8.3.3.2.4. By End User
8.3.4. Japan Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
8.3.4.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.4.1.1. By Value
8.3.4.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.4.2.1. By Service
8.3.4.2.2. By Location
8.3.4.2.3. By Modality
8.3.4.2.4. By End User
8.3.5. Australia Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
8.3.5.1. Market Size & Forecast
8.3.5.1.1. By Value
8.3.5.2. Market Share & Forecast
8.3.5.2.1. By Service
8.3.5.2.2. By Location
8.3.5.2.3. By Modality
8.3.5.2.4. By End User
9. South America Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
9.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.1.1. By Value
9.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.2.1. By Service
9.2.2. By Location
9.2.3. By Modality
9.2.4. By End User
9.2.5. By Country
9.3. South America: Country Analysis
9.3.1. Brazil Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
9.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.3.1.1.1. By Value
9.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.3.1.2.1. By Service
9.3.1.2.2. By Location
9.3.1.2.3. By Modality
9.3.1.2.4. By End User
9.3.2. Argentina Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
9.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.3.2.1.1. By Value
9.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.3.2.2.1. By Service
9.3.2.2.2. By Location
9.3.2.2.3. By Modality
9.3.2.2.4. By End User
9.3.3. Colombia Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
9.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
9.3.3.1.1. By Value
9.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
9.3.3.2.1. By Service
9.3.3.2.2. By Location
9.3.3.2.3. By Modality
9.3.3.2.4. By End User
10. Middle East and Africa Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
10.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.1.1. By Value
10.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.2.1. By Service
10.2.2. By Location
10.2.3. By Modality
10.2.4. By End User
10.2.5. By Country
10.3. MEA: Country Analysis
10.3.1. South Africa Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
10.3.1.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.3.1.1.1. By Value
10.3.1.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.3.1.2.1. By Service
10.3.1.2.2. By Location
10.3.1.2.3. By Modality
10.3.1.2.4. By End User
10.3.2. Saudi Arabia Radiology as a Service Market Outlook
10.3.2.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.3.2.1.1. By Value
10.3.2.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.3.2.2.1. By Service
10.3.2.2.2. By Location
10.3.2.2.3. By Modality
10.3.2.2.4. By End User
10.3.3. UAE Radiology as a Service Outlook
10.3.3.1. Market Size & Forecast
10.3.3.1.1. By Value
10.3.3.2. Market Share & Forecast
10.3.3.2.1. By Service
10.3.3.2.2. By Location
10.3.3.2.3. By Modality
10.3.3.2.4. By End User
11. Market Dynamics
11.1. Drivers
11.2. Challenges
12. Market Trends & Developments
12.1. Recent Developments
12.2. Product Launches
12.3. Mergers & Acquisitions
13. PESTLE Analysis
14. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
14.1. Competition in the Industry
14.2. Potential of New Entrants
14.3. Power of Suppliers
14.4. Power of Customers
14.5. Threat of Substitute Product
15. Competitive Landscape
15.1. The Radiology Group LLC
15.1.1. Business Overview
15.1.2. Company Snapshot
15.1.3. Products & Services
15.1.4. Financials (As Reported)
15.1.5. Recent Developments
15.1.6. Key Personnel Details
15.1.7. SWOT Analysis
15.2. Enlitic, Inc.
15.3. Medica Reporting Ltd.
15.4. OnRad, Inc.
15.5. Nano-x Imaging Ltd.
15.6. TeleDiagnosys Services Pvt Ltd.
15.7. Fovia, Inc.
15.8. HealthLevel, Inc.
15.9. Lucid Health, Inc.
15.10. medQ, Inc.
16. Strategic Recommendations17. About the Publisher & Disclaimer

Companies Mentioned

  • The Radiology Group LLC
  • Enlitic, Inc.
  • Medica Reporting Ltd.
  • OnRad, Inc.
  • Nano-x Imaging Ltd.
  • TeleDiagnosys Services Pvt Ltd.
  • Fovia, Inc.
  • HealthLevel, Inc.
  • Lucid Health, Inc.
  • medQ, Inc.

Table Information