In Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled decades of circuit precedent that required Title VII plaintiffs to prove not only that they’d been discriminated against at work, but also that the discrimination caused them a significant disadvantage by harming their career prospects or their pocketbook.Hear from one of Muldrow’s lawyers and analyze the perspective of both sides of the employment bar
Hear from one of Muldrow’s lawyers about how Muldrow’s case came to the Court. The speakers also address the impacts of the Court’s holding that an employee challenging a discriminatory job transfer need not show that the discrimination caused them some additional, significant harm.
Course Content
1:00 - 1:15 pmMuldrow’s Path to the Supreme Court
Madeline Meth, Esq.,
Jamaica Plain
1:15 - 1:20 pm
Understanding Muldrow’s Holding
Madeline Meth, Esq.,
Jamaica Plain
1:20 - 1:45 pm
Muldrow’s Impact Beyond Title VII and Discriminatory Transfer Cases Including DEI Initiatives
Robert M. Hale, Esq.,
Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston
Madeline Meth, Esq.,
Jamaica Plain
1:45 - 2:00 pm
'Ask the Experts' Q&A Session and Key Takeaways
Robert M. Hale, Esq.,
Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston
Madeline Meth, Esq.,
Jamaica Plain
Please Note
This webcast is delivered completely online, underscoring their convenience and appeal.
There are no published print materials. All written materials are available electronically only.
They are posted 24 hours prior to the program and can be accessed, downloaded, or printed from your computer.
Speaker(s)
ChairMadeline Meth, Esq.,
Jamaica Plain
Faculty
Robert M. Hale, Esq.,
Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston
