Automation of the RAN (Radio Access Network) - the most expensive, technically complex and power-intensive part of cellular infrastructure - is a key aspect of mobile operators' digital transformation strategies aimed at reducing their TCO (Total Cost of Ownership), improving network quality and achieving revenue generation targets. In conjunction with AI (Artificial Intelligence) and ML (Machine Learning), RAN automation has the potential to significantly transform mobile network economics by reducing the OpEx (Operating Expenditure)-to-revenue ratio, minimizing energy consumption, lowering CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) emissions, deferring avoidable CapEx (Captial Expenditure), optimizing performance, improving user experience and enabling new services.
The RAN automation market traces its origins to the beginning of the LTE era when SON (Self-Organizing Network) technology was introduced to reduce cellular network complexity through self-configuration, self-optimization and self-healing. While embedded D-SON (Distributed SON) capabilities such as ANR (Automatic Neighbor Relations) have become a standard feature in RAN products, C-SON (Centralized SON) solutions that abstract control from edge nodes for network-wide actions have been adopted by less than a third of world's approximately 800 national mobile operators due to constraints associated with multi-vendor interoperability, scalability and latency.
These shortcomings, together with the cellular industry's shift towards open interfaces, common information models, virtualization and software-driven networking, are driving a transition from the traditional D-SON and C-SON approach to Open RAN automation with standards-based components - specifically the Near-RT (Real-Time) and Non-RT RICs (RAN Intelligent Controllers), SMO (Service Management & Orchestration) framework, xApps (Extended Applications) and rApps (RAN Applications) - that enable greater levels of RAN programmability and automation.
Along with the ongoing SON to RIC transition, RAN automation use cases have also evolved over the last decade. For example, relatively basic MLB (Mobility Load Balancing) capabilities have metamorphosed into more sophisticated policy-guided traffic steering applications that utilize AI/ML-driven optimization algorithms to efficiently adapt to peaks and troughs in network load and service usage by dynamically managing and redistributing traffic across radio resources and frequency layers.
Due to the much higher density of radios and cell sites in the 5G era, energy efficiency has emerged as one of the most prioritized use cases of RAN automation as forward-thinking mobile operators push ahead with sustainability initiatives to reduce energy consumption, carbon emissions and operating costs without degrading network quality. Some of the other use cases that have garnered considerable interest from the operator community include network slicing enablement, application-aware optimization and anomaly detection.
While the benefits of SON-based RAN automation in live networks are well-known, expectations are even higher with the RIC, SMO and x/rApps approach. For example, Japanese brownfield operator NTT DoCoMo expects to lower its TCO by up to 30% and decrease power consumption at base stations by as much as 50% using Open RAN automation. It is worth highlighting that domestic rival Rakuten Mobile has already achieved approximately 17% energy savings per cell in its live network using RIC-hosted RAN automation applications. Following successful lab trials, the greenfield operator aims to increase savings to 25% with more sophisticated AI/ML models.
Although Open RAN automation efforts seemingly lost momentum beyond the field trial phase for the past couple of years, several commercial engagements have emerged since then, with much of the initial focus on the SMO, Non-RT RIC and rApps for automated management and optimization across Open RAN, purpose-built and hybrid RAN environments. Within the framework of its five-year $14 Billion Open RAN infrastructure contract with Ericsson, AT&T is adopting the Swedish telecommunications giant's SMO and Non-RT RIC solution to replace two legacy C-SON systems. In neighboring Canada, Telus has also initiated the implementation of an SMO and RIC platform along with its multi-vendor Open RAN deployment to transform up to 50% of its RAN footprint and swap out Huawei equipment from its 4G/5G network.
Similar efforts are also underway in other regions. For example, in Europe, Swisscom is deploying an SMO and Non-RT RIC platform to provide multi-technology network management and automation capabilities as part of a wider effort to future-proof its brownfield mobile network, while Deutsche Telekom is progressing with plans to develop its own vendor-independent SMO framework. Open RAN automation is also expected to be introduced as part of Vodafone Group's global tender for refreshing 170,000 cell sites.
Deployments of newer generations of proprietary SON-based RAN automation solutions have not stalled either. In its pursuit of achieving L4 (Highly Autonomous Network) operations, China Mobile has recently initiated the implementation of a hierarchical RAN automation platform and an associated digital twin system, starting with China's Henan province. Among other interesting examples, SoftBank is implementing a closed loop automation solution for cluster-wide RAN optimization in stadiums, event venues, and other strategic locations across Japan, which supports data collection and parameter tuning in 1-5 minute intervals as opposed to the 15-minute control cycle of traditional C-SON systems. It should be noted that the Japanese operator eventually plans to adopt RIC-hosted centralized RAN optimization applications in the future.
In addition, with the support of several mobile operators, including SoftBank, Vodafone, Bell Canada and Viettel, the idea of hosting third party applications for real-time intelligent control and optimization - also referred to as dApps (Distributed Applications) - directly within RAN baseband platforms is beginning to gain traction. As a counterbalance to this approach, Ericsson, Nokia, Huawei and other established RAN vendors are making considerable progress with a stepwise approach towards embedding AI and ML functionalities deeper into their DU (Distributed Unit) and CU (Centralized Unit) products in line with the 3GPP's long-term vision of an AI/ML-based air interface in the 6G era.
The publisher estimates that global spending on RIC, SMO and x/rApps will grow at a CAGR of more than 125% between 2024 and 2027 alongside the second wave of Open RAN infrastructure rollouts by brownfield operators. The Open RAN automation market will eventually account for nearly $700 Million in annual investments by the end of 2027 as standardization gaps and technical challenges in terms of the SMO-to-Non-RT RIC interface, application portability across RIC platforms and conflict mitigation between x/rApps are ironed out. The wider RAN automation software and services market - which includes Open RAN automation, RAN vendor SON solutions, third party C-SON platforms, baseband-integrated intelligent RAN applications, RAN planning and optimization software, and test/measurement solutions - is expected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 8% during the same period.
The “RAN Automation, SON, RIC, xApps & rApps in the 5G Era: 2024 - 2030 - Opportunities, Challenges, Strategies & Forecasts” report presents an in-depth assessment of the RAN automation market, including the value chain, market drivers, barriers to uptake, enabling technologies, functional areas, use cases, key trends, future roadmap, standardization, case studies, ecosystem player profiles and strategies. The report also provides global and regional market size forecasts for RAN and end-to-end mobile network automation from 2024 to 2030. The forecasts cover three network domains, nine functional areas, three access technologies and five regional markets.
The report comes with an associated Excel datasheet suite covering quantitative data from all numeric forecasts presented in the report.
The report covers the following topics:
- Introduction to RAN automation
- Value chain and ecosystem structure
- Market drivers and challenges
- Functional areas of RAN automation
- RAN automation technology and architecture, including DSON, CSON, HSON, NearRT/NonRT RICs, SMO, x/rApps, basebandintegrated intelligent RAN applications, RAN planning and optimization software, and test & measurement solutions
- Review of over 70 RAN automation use cases, ranging from ANR, PCI and RACH optimization to advanced traffic steering, QoEbased resource allocation, energy savings, network slicing, private 5G automation, anomaly detection and dynamic RAN security
- Key trends in intelligent RAN implementations, including the SONtoRIC transition, closed loop automation, intentdriven management, operational AI/ML, Gen AI, data analytics and application awareness
- Crossdomain mobile network automation enablers and application scenarios across the RAN, core and xHaul transport segments of cellular infrastructure
- Detailed case studies of 20 productiongrade RAN automation deployments and examination of ongoing projects covering both traditional SON and Open RAN automation approaches
- Future roadmap of RAN automation
- Standardization and collaborative initiatives
- Profiles and strategies of more than 280 ecosystem players, including RAN infrastructure vendors, SON, RIC and SMO platform providers, x/rApp developers, AI/ML technology specialists, RAN planning and optimization software suppliers, and test/measurement solution providers
- Exclusive interview transcripts from 10 companies across the RAN automation value chain: AirHop Communications, Amdocs, Groundhog Technologies, Innovile, Net AI, Nokia, P.I. Works, Qualcomm, Rakuten Mobile and RIMEDO Labs
- Strategic recommendations for RAN automation solution providers and mobile operators
- Market analysis and forecasts from 2024 to 2030
Mobile Network Automation Submarkets
- RAN
- Mobile Core
- xHaul (Fronthaul, Midhaul & Backhaul) Transport
- RAN Automation Functional Areas
- SONBased Automation
- RAN Vendor SON Solutions
- Third Party CSON Platforms
- Open RAN Automation
- NonRT RIC & SMO
- NearRT RIC
- rApps
- xApps
- BasebandIntegrated Intelligent RAN Applications
- RAN Planning & Optimization Software
- Test & Measurement Solutions
- Access Technology Generation Submarkets
- LTE
- 5G NR
- 6G
Regional Markets
- North America
- Asia Pacific
- Europe
- Middle East & Africa
- Latin & Central America
Key Questions Answered:
- The report provides answers to the following key questions:
- How big is the RAN automation opportunity?
- What trends, drivers and challenges are influencing its growth?
- What will the market size be in 2027, and at what rate will it grow?
- Which submarkets and regions will see the highest percentage of growth?
- What are the practical and quantifiable benefits of RAN automation based on live commercial deployments?
- What is the TCO reduction and cost savings potential of RAN automation?
- What is the adoption status of traditional SON solutions and Open RAN specificationscompliant NearRT RIC, NonRT RIC, SMO, xApps and rApps?
- How can brownfield operators capitalize on Open RAN automation to simplify the management and optimization of hybrid RAN environments?
- In what way will automation and AI/ML facilitate network slicing, MIMO, beamforming, lowerlayer optimization and other advanced RAN capabilities in the 5G era?
- What are the application scenarios of operational AI/ML and Gen AI in the RAN automation market?
- What opportunities exist for automation in the mobile core and xHaul transport domains?
- How does RAN automation ease the deployment and operation of private 5G networks?
- In what way does intelligent automation impact the role of RAN engineers?
- Who are the key ecosystem players, and what are their strategies?
- Which RAN automation platform and application vendors are leading the market?
- What strategies should RAN automation solution providers and mobile operators adopt to remain competitive?
The report has the following key findings:
- The analyser estimates that global spending on RIC, SMO and x/rApps will grow at a CAGR of more than 125% between 2024 and 2027 alongside the second wave of Open RAN infrastructure rollouts by brownfield operators. The Open RAN automation market will eventually account for nearly $700 Million in annual investments by the end of 2027 as standardization gaps and technical challenges in terms of the SMOtoNonRT RIC interface, application portability across RIC platforms and conflict mitigation between x/rApps are ironed out.
- The wider market for RAN automation software and services - which includes Open RAN automation, RAN vendor SON solutions, third party CSON platforms, basebandintegrated intelligent RAN applications, RAN planning and optimization software, and test/measurement solutions - is expected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 8% during the same period.
- The shortcomings of the traditional DSON and CSON approach, together with the cellular industry's shift towards open interfaces, common information models, virtualization and softwaredriven networking, are driving a transition to Open RAN automation with standardsbased components that enable greater levels of RAN programmability and automation.
- The Open RAN automation movement is stimulating innovation from a diversified community of application developers. In addition to well over a dozen providers of SMO, NonRT RIC and NearRT RIC products, more than 50 companies are actively engaged in the development of xApps and rApps.
- Some mobile operators have established dedicated business units to commoditize their RAN automation expertise. NTT DoCoMo's OREX brand and Rakuten Mobile's sister company Rakuten Symphony are two wellknown cases in point. In the coming years, we also expect to see more spinoffs of academic institutes with commercialgrade Open RAN automation offerings, such as Northeastern University's zTouch Networks and TU Ilmenau's AiVader.
- The SMO and RIC ecosystem is exhibiting early signs of consolidation with Broadcom's takeover of VMware and HPE's planned acquisition of Juniper Networks, although both deals have much wider ranging implications for the AI infrastructure and networking industries. Depending on the commercial success of third party RAN automation platforms, we anticipate seeing further M&A (Mergers & Acquisition) activity reminiscent of the SON boom in the previous decade.
- While the benefits of SONbased RAN automation in live networks are wellknown, expectations are even higher with the RIC, SMO and x/rApps approach. For example, Japanese brownfield operator NTT DoCoMo expects to lower its TCO by up to 30% and decrease power consumption at base stations by as much as 50% using Open RAN automation.
- It is worth highlighting that domestic rival Rakuten Mobile has already achieved approximately 17% energy savings per cell in its live network using RIChosted RAN automation applications. Following successful lab trials, the greenfield operator aims to increase savings to 25% with more sophisticated AI/ML models.
- Outside of public mobile operator networks, interest is also growing in vertical industries and the private wireless segment. The U.S. DOD (Department of Defense) is actively exploring the potential of RIChosted x/rApps to enhance the ability to detect, analyze, and mitigate a wide range of security threats in Open RAN networks for both commercial and warfighter communication scenarios. Among other examples, Taiwanese electronics manufacturer Inventec has incorporated rApps for indoor positioning and traffic steering as part of its private 5G network solution for smart factories.
- Although Open RAN automation efforts seemingly lost momentum beyond the field trial phase for the past couple of years, several commercial engagements have emerged since then, with much of the initial focus on the SMO, NonRT RIC and rApps for automated management and optimization across Open RAN, purposebuilt and hybrid RAN environments.
- Within the framework of its fiveyear $14 Billion Open RAN infrastructure contract with Ericsson, AT&T is adopting the Swedish telecommunications giant's SMO and NonRT RIC solution to replace two legacy CSON systems. In neighboring Canada, Telus has also initiated the implementation of an SMO and RIC platform along with its multivendor Open RAN deployment to transform up to 50% of its RAN footprint and swap out Huawei equipment from its 4G/5G network.
- Similar efforts are also underway in other regions. For example, in Europe, Swisscom is deploying an SMO and NonRT RIC platform to provide multitechnology network management and automation capabilities as part of a wider effort to futureproof its brownfield mobile network, while Deutsche Telekom is progressing with plans to develop its own vendorindependent SMO framework. Open RAN automation is also expected to be introduced as part of Vodafone Group's global tender for refreshing 170,000 cell sites.
- Deployments of newer generations of proprietary SONbased RAN automation solutions have not stalled either. In its pursuit of achieving L4 automation, China Mobile has recently initiated the implementation of a hierarchical RAN automation platform and an associated digital twin system, starting with China's Henan province.
- Among other interesting examples, SoftBank is implementing a closed loop automation solution for clusterwide RAN optimization in stadiums, event venues, and other strategic locations across Japan, which supports data collection and parameter tuning in 15 minute intervals as opposed to the 15minute control cycle of traditional CSON systems. It should be noted that the Japanese operator eventually plans to adopt RIChosted centralized RAN optimization applications in the future.
- In addition, with the support of several mobile operators, including SoftBank, Vodafone, Bell Canada and Viettel, the idea of hosting third party applications for realtime intelligent control and optimization - also referred to as dApps - directly within RAN baseband platforms is beginning to gain traction.
- As a counterbalance to this approach, Ericsson, Nokia, Huawei and other established RAN vendors are making considerable progress with a stepwise approach towards embedding AI and ML functionalities deeper into their DU and CU products in line with the 3GPP's longterm vision of an AI/MLbased air interface in the 6G era.
- Beyond AIdriven RAN performance and efficiency improvements, mobile operators, technology suppliers and other stakeholders are also setting their sights on TCO benefits and new revenue opportunities enabled by the convergence of AI and RAN, including cohosting vRAN and AI workloads on the same underlying infrastructure to maximize asset utilization and leveraging the RAN as a platform for edge AI services.
Table of Contents
Companies Mentioned (Partial List)
A selection of companies mentioned in this report includes, but is not limited to:
- 1&1
- 3GPP (Third Generation Partnership Project)
- 4iG Group
- A10 Networks
- A5G Networks
- Aalyria
- Aarna Networks
- Abside Networks
- Accedian
- Accelleran
- Accuver
- Acentury
- Actiontec Electronics
- Adtran
- Aglocell
- AI-LINK
- Aira Technologies
- AI-RAN Alliance
- Aircom
- AirHop Communications
- Airspan Networks
- AiVader
- Aliniant
- Allot
- Alpha Networks
- Alphabet
- Altice Portugal
- Amazon
- AMD (Advanced Micro Devices)
- Amdocs
- América Móvil
- Andorra Telecom
- Anktion (Fujian) Technology
- Anritsu
- Antevia Networks
- Arcadyan Technology Corporation
- Argela
- ARIB (Association of Radio Industries and Businesses, Japan)
- Arm
- ArrayComm (Chengdu ArrayComm Wireless Technologies)
- Arrcus
- Artemis Networks
- Artiza Networks
- Arukona
- AsiaInfo Technologies
- Askey Computer Corporation
- ASOCS
- Aspire Technology
- ASTRI (Hong Kong Applied Science and Technology Research Institute)
- ASUS (ASUSTeK Computer)
- AT&T
- Ataya
- ATDI
- Atesio
- ATIS (Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions)
- Atrinet
- Auden Techno
- Auray Technology
- Aviat Networks
- AWS (Amazon Web Services)
- Axiata Group
- Azcom Technology
- Baicells
- Batelco
- beCloud (Belarusian Cloud Technologies)
- Beeline Russia (VimpelCom)
- Bell Canada
- Betacom
- Bharti Airtel
- BLiNQ Networks
- Blu Wireless
- Booz Allen Hamilton
- BravoCom
- Broadcom
- BT Group
- BTC (Botswana Telecommunications Corporation)
- BTI Wireless
- BubbleRAN
- B-Yond
- C Spire
- C3Spectra
- CableFree (Wireless Excellence)
- Cambium Networks
- Capgemini Engineering
- CBNG (Cambridge Broadband Networks Group)
- CCI (Communication Components Inc.)
- CCSA (China Communications Standards Association)
- Celfinet
- Cellfie Mobile
- Celona
- CelPlan Technologies
- Ceragon Networks
- CETC (China Electronics Technology Group Corporation)
- CETIN Group
- CGI
- Chengdu NTS
- China Mobile
- China Telecom
- China Unicom
- CICT – China Information and Communication Technology Group (China Xinke Group)
- Ciena Corporation
- CIG (Cambridge Industries Group)
- Cisco Systems
- CK Hutchison
- Claro Colombia
- Clavister
- Cohere Technologies
- Comarch
- Comba Telecom
- CommAgility
- CommScope
- Compal Electronics
- COMSovereign
- Contela
- Corning
- CPQD (Center for Research and Development in Telecommunications, Brazil)
- Creanord
- Cyient
- Datang Telecom Technology & Industry Group
- DeepSig
- Dell Technologies
- DGS (Digital Global Systems)
- DIGI Communications
- Digis Squared
- Digitata
- DISH Network Corporation
- Djezzy
- D-Link Corporation
- Druid Software
- DSA (Dynamic Spectrum Alliance)
- DT (Deutsche Telekom)
- DZS
- ECE (European Communications Engineering)
- EDX Wireless
- EE
- eino
- Elisa
- Elisa Polystar
- Encora
- Equiendo
- Ericsson
- Errigal
- E-Space
- Etisalat Group (e&)
- ETRI (Electronics & Telecommunications Research Institute, South Korea)
- ETSI (European Telecommunications Standards Institute)
- EXFO
- F5
- Fairspectrum
- Federated Wireless
- FET (Far EasTone Telecommunications)
- FiberHome Technologies
- Firecell
- Flash Networks
- Forsk
- Fortinet
- Foxconn (Hon Hai Technology Group)
- Fraunhofer HHI (Heinrich Hertz Institute)
- Fujitsu
- FullRays (LDAS – LocationDAS)
- Future Connections
- FYRA
- G REIGNS
- Gemtek Technology
- GENEViSiO
- Gigamon
- GigaTera Communications
- GlobalLogic
- Globalstar
- Globe Telecom
- Groundhog Technologies
- GSMA (GSM Association)
- GTAA (Global Telco AI Alliance)
- Guavus
- GXC (Formerly GenXComm)
- HCLTech (HCL Technologies)
- Helios (Fujian Helios Technologies)
- HFR Networks
- Highstreet Technologies
- Hitachi
- HPE (Hewlett Packard Enterprise)
- HSC (Hughes Systique Corporation)
- HTC Corporation
- Huawei
- Hutchison Drei Austria
- IBM
- iBwave Solutions
- iConNext
- IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force)
- Infinera
- Infosys
- Infovista
- Inmanta
- Innovile
- InnoWireless
- Intel Corporation
- InterDigital
- Intracom Telecom
- Inventec Corporation
- ISCO International
- IS-Wireless
- Itential
- ITRI (Industrial Technology Research Institute, Taiwan)
- ITU (International Telecommunication Union)
- JMA Wireless
- JRC (Japan Radio Company)
- Juniper Networks
- KDDI
- Key Bridge Wireless
- Keysight Technologies
- Kleos
- KMW
- KPN
- KT Corporation
- Kumu Networks
- Kuzey Kıbrıs Turkcell
- Kyivstar
- Lemko Corporation
- Lenovo
- LG Uplus
- Liberty Global
- life:)/BeST (Belarusian Telecommunications Network)
- lifecell Ukraine
- Lime Microsystems
- Linux Foundation
- LIONS Technology
- LITE-ON Technology Corporation
- LitePoint
- LS telcom
- LTT (Libya Telecom & Technology)
- LuxCarta
- MantisNet
- Marvell Technology
- MÁSMÓVIL
- Mavenir
- Maxar Technologies
- MegaFon
- MEO
- Meta
- MicroNova
- Microsoft Corporation
- MikroTik
- MitraStar Technology
- Mobileum
- MosoLabs
- MTN Group
- MTS (Mobile TeleSystems)
- MYCOM OSI
- Nash Technologies
- NEC Corporation
- Net AI
- Netcracker Technology
- NETSCOUT Systems
- Netsia
- Neutroon Technologies
- New H3C Technologies
- New Postcom Equipment
- Nextivity
- NGMN Alliance
- Node-H
- Nokia
- Northeastern University
- Novowi
- NTT DoCoMo
- NuRAN Wireless
- NVIDIA Corporation
- NXP Semiconductors
- NYCU (National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University)
- Oceus Networks
- Odido
- Omnitele
- OneLayer
- ONF (Open Networking Foundation)
- OnGo Alliance
- Ookla
- Ooredoo
- Ooredoo Algeria
- Ooredoo Tunisia
- Opanga Networks
- Optus
- O-RAN Alliance
- Orange
- OREX
- OSA (OpenAirInterface Software Alliance)
- P.I. Works
- Palo Alto Networks
- Parallel Wireless
- Pente Networks
- Phluido
- Picocom
- Pivotal Commware
- PLDT
- Potevio
- QCT (Quanta Cloud Technology)
- QNAP Systems
- Qualcomm
- Quanta Computer
- Qucell Networks
- RADCOM
- Radisys
- Radware
- Rakuten Mobile
- Rakuten Symphony
- Ranlytics
- Ranplan Wireless
- Reailize
- Rebaca Technologies
- Red Hat
- RED Technologies
- Reliance Industries
- Reliance Jio Infocomm
- REPLY
- RIMEDO Labs
- Rivada Networks
- Rogers Communications
- Rohde & Schwarz
- Ruijie Networks
- RunEL
- SageRAN (Guangzhou SageRAN Technology)
- Samji Electronics
- Samsung
- Sandvine
- SCF (Small Cell Forum)
- Sercomm Corporation
- ServiceNow
- Shabodi
- Shyam Group
- Signalwing
- Singtel
- SIRADEL
- SK Telecom
- Skyvera (TelcoDR)
- Smart Communications
- Smartfren
- SoftBank Group
- SOLiD
- Sooktha
- Spectrum Effect
- Spirent Communications
- SRS (Software Radio Systems)
- SSC (Shared Spectrum Company)
- Star Solutions
- STC (Saudi Telecom Company)
- Subex
- Sunwave Communications
- Supermicro (Super Micro Computer)
- SUTD (Singapore University of Technology and Design)
- Swisscom
- SynaXG Technologies
- Systemics-PAB
- T&W (Shenzhen Gongjin Electronics)
- Tarana Wireless
- TCS (Tata Consultancy Services)
- TDC NET
- Tech Mahindra
- Tecore Networks
- TECTWIN
- Telecom Argentina
- Telefónica Germany
- Telefónica Group
- Telia Company
- Telkomsel
- Telrad Networks
- Telstra
- Telus
- TEOCO
- Teradyne
- Texas A&M University
- Thales
- ThinkRF
- TI (Texas Instruments)
- TietoEVRY
- TIM (Telecom Italia Mobile)
- TIM Brasil
- TIP (Telecom Infra Project)
- TM Forum
- TPG Telecom
- Trópico
- TSDSI (Telecommunications Standards Development Society, India)
- Tsinghua Unigroup
- TTA (Telecommunications Technology Association, South Korea)
- TTC (Telecommunication Technology Committee, Japan)
- TTG International
- Tupl
- Türk Telekom
- Turkcell
- U.S. DOD (Department of Defense)
- U.S. NTIA (National Telecommunications and Information Administration)
- Ucom (Armenia)
- ULAK Communication
- University of California San Diego
- University of Lancaster
- University of Málaga
- Unizyx Holding Corporation
- Vavitel (Shenzhen Vavitel Technology)
- VEON
- Verizon Communications
- VHT (Viettel High Tech)
- Vi (Vodafone Idea)
- VIAVI Solutions
- Viettel Group
- Virgin Media O2
- VMware
- VNL (Vihaan Networks Limited)
- Vodafone Germany
- Vodafone Group
- Vodafone Ireland
- Vodafone Turkey
- Wave Electronics
- WDNA (Wireless DNA)
- WIM Technologies
- Wind River Systems
- WInnForum (Wireless Innovation Forum)
- Wipro
- Wistron Corporation
- Wiwynn
- WNC (Wistron NeWeb Corporation)
- Xingtera
- Zain Group
- Zain Saudi Arabia (Zain KSA)
- ZaiNar
- Z-Com
- Zeetta Networks
- Zinkworks
- ZTE
- zTouch Networks
- Zyxel
Methodology
The contents of the reports are accumulated by combining information attained from a range of primary and secondary research sources.
In addition to analyzing official corporate announcements, policy documents, media reports, and industry statements, the publisher seeks opinions from leading industry players within each sector to derive an unbiased, accurate and objective mix of market trends, forecasts and the future prospects of the industry.
LOADING...