+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Neurodiagnostic and Monitoring Devices Patent Landscape Report

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 200 Pages
  • August 2024
  • Region: Global
  • Expert Market Research
  • ID: 5997650
The global neurodiagnostic and monitoring devices market reached a value of D 20 billion in 2023. The market is further expected to grow at a CAGR of about 11.6% during the forecast period of 2024-2032 to reach a value of around USD 53.5 billion by 2032. The patent landscape for neurodiagnostic and monitoring devices is dynamic, with the United States leading in filings. It holds over 3,000 patents focused on EEG, MEG, and AI-enhanced diagnostics advancements.

Patent Landscape Report Coverage

This report offers an exhaustive analysis of the global neurodiagnostic and monitoring devices patent landscape. It delves into patent trends, notable innovations, and emerging technologies in this sector. The report includes a comprehensive review of patent filings, grants, and the leading companies that are shaping the industry. By highlighting strategic advancements and innovative developments, this report is an essential resource for stakeholders seeking to understand the intellectual property dynamics and competitive landscape of the neurodiagnostic and monitoring devices industry, ensuring they remain informed about ongoing and future trends.

Global Neurodiagnostic and Monitoring Devices Patent Outlook

  • The neurodiagnostic and monitoring devices patent landscape is driven by advancements in EEG and MEG technologies and the integration of AI for enhanced diagnostics. Over 5,000 patents focus on improving signal quality, patient comfort, and data analysis. Future growth is expected through innovations in non-invasive and portable solutions.
  • Companies like Brainscope Co. Inc. and Neurosigma Inc. are at the forefront, holding over 500 and 400 patents, respectively. Their focus is on portable EEG technology and AI-driven data analysis, aiming to enhance diagnostic precision and accessibility, underscoring their commitment to advancing neurodiagnostic technology.
  • In the United States, over 3,000 patents focus on AI integration and sensor technologies. European patents, especially in Germany and the UK, emphasize data interpretation and device interoperability, driven by regulatory standards. The Asia Pacific region, led by China and Japan, prioritises cost-effective, scalable solutions with over 1,500 patents filed.

Neurodiagnostic and Monitoring Devices Introduction

Neurodiagnostic and monitoring devices are essential tools in assessing and managing neurological disorders. These devices, such as EEG, MEG, and intracranial pressure monitors, enable precise evaluation of brain activity, helping diagnose conditions like epilepsy, brain injuries, and sleep disorders. The patent landscape for neurodiagnostic devices reflects significant innovation driven by the need for improved diagnostic accuracy, enhanced patient monitoring, and integration of advanced technologies.

  • Patent activity in EEG devices focuses on improving signal quality and patient comfort. Over 1,500 patents have been filed in the past decade, with recent filings emphasizing wireless technology and AI-enhanced data analysis for real-time diagnostics.
  • MEG technologies have seen a surge in patents aimed at enhancing sensor sensitivity and spatial resolution. Historically, around 800 patents have been filed, with new patents focusing on portable and non-invasive solutions to improve accessibility and clinical utility.
  • The incorporation of AI is a key patent driver, with approximately 1,200 patents filed focusing on automated data interpretation and predictive analytics. Future innovations are expected to enhance diagnostic capabilities and enable personalised treatment approaches.
These drivers foster a dynamic patent landscape, promoting cutting-edge innovations in neurodiagnostic technologies that improve diagnostic precision and patient care.

Global Neurodiagnostic and Monitoring Devices Patent Segmentation Analysis

The report provides an in-depth analysis of the patents in this field by the following segmentation:

Analysis by Product Type

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scanners
  • Computerized Tomography (CT) Scanners
  • Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scanners
  • Electroencephalograph (EEG) Devices
  • Electromyography (EMG) Devices
In the patent segmentation based on product type, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners dominate the landscape with over 6,500 patents filed and 900 new applications recently, focusing on advancements in imaging resolution, portability, and AI-driven analysis. Computerized tomography (CT) scanners hold over 4,200 patents and approximately 700 new applications, emphasizing reduced radiation exposure, increased scanning speed, and AI integration. Positron emission tomography (PET) scanners have around 3,000 patents filed and 500 new applications, targeting improved image clarity, advanced tracers, and PET-MRI combinations. Electroencephalograph (EEG) devices hold over 2,500 patents with 400 new applications, advancing wearable technology, real-time monitoring, and neurofeedback. Electromyography (EMG) devices have approximately 1,800 patents filed and 300 new applications, focusing on signal accuracy, portable devices, and rehabilitation integration.

Analysis by Application

  • Stroke Diagnosis
  • Epilepsy Monitoring
  • Sleep Disorders
  • Neurogenerative Diseases
  • Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Brain Tumor Detection
  • Others
In the patent segmentation based on application, stroke diagnosis leads with over 4,000 patents filed and 700 new applications, focusing on rapid detection and imaging advancements. Epilepsy monitoring holds around 3,500 patents with 600 new applications, emphasizing real-time monitoring and seizure prediction technologies. Sleep disorders have approximately 2,800 patents and 500 new applications, targeting wearable devices and accurate sleep pattern analysis. Neurodegenerative diseases hold over 3,200 patents with 550 new applications, focusing on early detection and disease progression tracking. Traumatic brain injury has around 2,500 patents filed and 400 new applications, emphasizing immediate diagnosis and monitoring of brain health. Brain tumor detection holds approximately 2,200 patents with 350 new applications, targeting enhanced imaging techniques and early detection methods. Others encompass a wide range of applications with around 1,800 patents filed, focusing on various neurological conditions and advanced diagnostic tools.

Analysis by End User

  • Hospitals
  • Diagnostic Imaging Centers
  • Neurology Clinics
  • Research and Academic Institutions
  • Home Care Settings
  • Others
In the patent segmentation based on end user, hospitals dominate with over 5,000 patents filed and 800 new applications, focusing on comprehensive neurodiagnostic capabilities. Diagnostic imaging centers hold around 3,800 patents with 600 new applications, emphasizing advanced imaging technologies. Neurology clinics have approximately 3,000 patents and 500 new applications, targeting specialised diagnostic tools. Research and academic institutions hold over 2,500 patents with 400 new applications, focusing on innovative research and development. Home care settings have around 2,000 patents filed and 300 new applications, emphasizing portable and user-friendly diagnostic devices. Others include a variety of settings with around 1,500 patents filed, focusing on diverse diagnostic needs.

Neurodiagnostic and Monitoring Devices Patent Jurisdiction Analysis

The global patent landscape for neurodiagnostic and monitoring devices is characterised by significant activity across key regions, including the United States, Europe, and Asia Pacific. In the United States, over 3,000 patents have been filed, driven by major companies' focus on integrating AI and advanced sensor technologies. In Europe, particularly in Germany and the UK, over 2,000 patents emphasize innovations in data interpretation and device interoperability, influenced by stringent regulatory standards. The Asia Pacific region, notably China and Japan, has filed over 1,500 patents, reflecting a dynamic and expanding healthcare technology landscape, with an emphasis on cost-effective and scalable solutions.

Patent Profile of Key Companies

The patent landscape for neurodiagnostic and monitoring devices is shaped by several key companies driving innovation and securing intellectual property. Here is an overview of their patent activities.

Brainscope Co Inc

Brainscope Co. Inc., headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, holds over 500 patents related to neurodiagnostic devices, with approximately 100 patents in progress. The company focuses on innovations in portable EEG technology and AI-driven data analysis, aiming to enhance diagnostic precision and accessibility. Brainscope's strategic patent filings reflect its commitment to advancing neurodiagnostic technology.

Neurosigma Inc

Neurosigma Inc., based in Los Angeles, California, has filed over 400 patents in the neurodiagnostic and monitoring devices sector, with around 80 patents currently in progress. The company focuses on non-invasive neuromodulation devices and integrating AI into diagnostic systems. Neurosigma's innovations aim to improve patient outcomes and maintain its leadership in neurodiagnostic technology.

Other key players in the industry include Ovid Therapeutics Inc., Cerner Innovation Inc., and Medtronic Inc.

Key Questions Answered in the Global Neurodiagnostic and Monitoring Devices Patent Landscape Report

  • What is the current state of the global patent landscape for neurodiagnostic and monitoring devices?
  • Which companies are leading the patent filings in the neurodiagnostic and monitoring devices industry?
  • What are the key drivers of patent activity in neurodiagnostic technologies?
  • How do EEG and MEG technologies contribute to heightened patent activities neurodiagnostic devices?
  • What role does AI integration play in the development of neurodiagnostic and monitoring devices?
  • Which regions are most active in patent filings for neurodiagnostic devices, and why?
  • How do patents for portable and non-invasive solutions impact the neurodiagnostic landscape?
  • What future trends are anticipated in the neurodiagnostic and monitoring devices patent landscape?
  • How do jurisdictional differences affect the patent landscape for neurodiagnostic devices?
  • What challenges do companies face in securing patents for neurodiagnostic technologies?
  • How do patents for hospital-focused devices differ from those for neurophysiological laboratories?
  • What impact does regulatory compliance have on patent filings in the neurodiagnostic devices industry?
  • How is the competitive landscape in the neurodiagnostic and monitoring devices industry shaped by patent activities?

Reasons to Purchase this Report

This report offers an in-depth analysis of the patent landscape, covering key trends, technological advancements, and regional insights. It provides detailed segmentation and highlights areas of significant innovation and activity. By examining leading companies' strategies and patent portfolios, the report elucidates competitive dynamics and emerging opportunities. Stakeholders will gain valuable information for strategic decision-making, ensuring they stay ahead in the evolving industry. This comprehensive coverage makes it an essential resource for understanding the industry's future direction.


This product will be delivered within 5-7 business days.

Table of Contents

1 Introduction2 Executive Summary
3 Global Neurodiagnostic and Monitoring Devices Market Overview
3.1 Global Neurodiagnostic and Monitoring Devices Market Historical Value (2017-2023)
3.2 Global Neurodiagnostic and Monitoring Devices Market Forecast Value (2024-2032)
4 Global Neurodiagnostic and Monitoring Devices Market Segmentation
4.1 Global Neurodiagnostic and Monitoring Devices Market (2017-2032) By Product Type
4.1.1 Market Overview
4.1.2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scanners
4.1.3 Computerized Tomography (CT) Scanners
4.1.4 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scanners
4.1.5 Electroencephalograph (EEG) Devices
4.1.6 Electromyography (EMG) Devices
4.1.7 Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Monitors
4.2 Global Neurodiagnostic and Monitoring Devices Market (2017-2032) by Application
4.2.1 Market Overview
4.2.2 Stroke Diagnosis
4.2.3 Epilepsy Monitoring
4.2.4 Sleep Disorders
4.2.5 Neurogenerative Diseases
4.2.6 Traumatic Brain Injury
4.2.7 Brain Tumor Detection
4.2.8 Others
4.3 Global Neurodiagnostic and Monitoring Devices Market (2017-2032) by End User
4.3.1 Market Overview
4.3.2 Hospitals
4.3.3 Diagnostic Imaging Centers
4.3.4 Neurology Clinics
4.3.5 Research and Academic Institutions
4.3.6 Home Care Settings
4.3.7 Others
5 Global Market Dynamics
5.1 Market Drivers and Constraints
5.2 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
5.3 PESTEL Analysis
5.4 Industry Events, Initiatives, and Trends
5.5 Value Chain Analysis
6 Global Neurodiagnostic and Monitoring Devices Patent Landscape Analysis
6.1 Patent Distribution by Publication Year
6.2 Patent Distribution by Application Year
6.3 Patent Distribution by Priority Year
6.4 Analysis by Type of Patent
6.4.1 Granted Patents
6.4.2 Patent Application
6.4.3 Amended Application
6.4.4 Search Report
6.5 Analysis by Legal Status
6.5.1 Active
6.5.2 Pending
6.5.3 Expired/Discontinued
6.6 Analysis by Patent Jurisdiction
6.7 Analysis by Patent Age
6.8 Analysis by Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) Codes
6.9 Average Time to Publish a Patent
6.9.1 By Entities
6.9.2 By Jurisdiction
6.9.3 By Technology
6.10 Analysis by Type of Entity (Academic and Non-Academic)
6.11 Analysis by Top Applicants
6.12 Analysis by Top Inventors
7 Global Neurodiagnostic and Monitoring Devices Patent Analysis by Technology
7.1 Total Patents by Top Technologies
7.2 Time Evolution of Patents by Technology
7.3 Emerging Technologies
7.4 Patent Segmentation, By Product Type
7.4.1 Time Evolution by Number of Patents
7.4.2 Time Evolution by Number of Patent Families
7.4.3 Analysis by Type of Entity (Academic vs Non-Academic)
7.4.4 Analysis by Top Applicants
7.4.5 Analysis by Top Inventors
7.5 Patent Segmentation, By End User
8 Patent Valuation Analysis
8.1 Assessment Methodology
8.2 High Value Patents
8.3 Medium Value Patents
8.4 Low Value Patents
9 Global Neurodiagnostic and Monitoring Devices - Top 10 Players Patent Analysis
9.1 Top 10 Entities by Number of Patents
9.2 Analysis by Publication Year
9.3 Analysis by Application Year
9.4 Analysis by Priority Year
9.5 Analysis by Type of Patent
9.6 Analysis by Jurisdiction
9.7 Analysis by Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) Codes
9.8 Analysis by Source of Innovation
9.9 Analysis by Forward and Backward Citations
9.10 Analysis by Legal Status
9.11 Analysis by Patent Age
9.12 Analysis by Key Inventors
9.13 Entity Dynamics
9.13.1 Analysis by Type of Player (Academic vs Non-Academic)
9.13.2 Analysis by Collaboration
9.13.3 Analysis by Technology
9.13.4 Newcomers
9.13.4.1 Start-up Companies
9.13.4.2 Established Companies
10 Patent Profile of Key Players
10.1 Brainscope Co Inc
10.1.1 Product Portfolio
10.1.2 Patent Portfolio by Patent Families
10.1.3 Time Evolution of Patents
10.1.4 Geographical Patent Coverage
10.1.5 Patent Analysis by Technology
10.1.6 Patent News and Developments
10.1.7 Financial Analysis
10.1.8 SWOT Analysis
10.2 Neurosigma Inc
10.3 Ovid Therapeutics Inc
10.4 Cerner Innovation Inc
10.5 Medtronic Inc
11 Future Trends
12 Global Neurodiagnostic and Monitoring Devices Landscape (Additional Insight)*
12.1 Global Neurodiagnostic and Monitoring Devices: Developers Landscape
12.1.1 Analysis by Year of Establishment
12.1.2 Analysis by Company Size
12.1.3 Analysis by Region
12.2 Global Neurodiagnostic and Monitoring Devices: Product Landscape
12.2.1 Analysis by Product Type

Companies Mentioned

  • Medtronic Inc.
  • Spinal Modulation Inc.
  • Ovid Therapeutics Inc.
  • Neurosigma Inc.
  • Brainscope Co Inc.
  • Univ California
  • Cerner Innovation Inc.

Methodology

Loading
LOADING...

Table Information