+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Wound Therapy Devices Patent Landscape Report

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 200 Pages
  • August 2024
  • Region: Global
  • Expert Market Research
  • ID: 5997659
The global wound therapy devices market size was valued at USD 1.6 billion in 2023. The market is anticipated to grow at a CAGR of 4.2% during the forecast period 2024-2032 to reach a value of USD 2.3 billion by 2032. The patent landscape for wound therapy devices is robust, with the United States leading in filings. Over 2,000 patents focus on innovations in NPWT and HBOT systems, targeting enhanced patient comfort and treatment efficiency.

Patent Landscape Report Coverage

This report offers a comprehensive analysis of the global wound therapy devices patent landscape. It delves into patent trends, key innovations, and emerging technologies within the field of wound therapy devices. The report examines patent filings, patent grants, and leading companies, highlighting the strategic advancements and innovations that are shaping the future of wound therapy technology. It serves as an essential resource for stakeholders seeking insights into the intellectual property dynamics and competitive landscape of the wound therapy devices industry.

Global Wound Therapy Devices Patent Outlook

  • The wound therapy devices patent landscape is driven by innovations in negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) systems, along with the integration of smart technologies. Over 5,000 patents have been filed globally, emphasizing advanced designs and enhanced patient comfort.
  • Key companies such as Smith & Nephew Plc and Mölnlycke Health Care AB lead the patent landscape, holding over 1,300 and 1,000 patents, respectively. These companies focus on advanced wound dressings and smart system integrations, underscoring their commitment to innovation and leadership in wound care technology.
  • In the United States, over 2,000 patents emphasize advanced wound care technologies. European patents, particularly in Germany and the UK, focus on device safety and efficiency, driven by regulatory standards. The Asia Pacific region, led by China and Japan, prioritises cost-effective and scalable solutions with over 1,200 patents filed.

Wound Therapy Devices Introduction

Wound therapy devices are crucial in managing and healing various types of wounds, including acute and chronic wounds. These devices, such as negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) systems, are designed to promote faster healing, reduce infection risk, and improve patient outcomes. The patent landscape for wound therapy devices reflects significant innovation driven by the need for more effective treatment modalities, enhanced patient safety, and the integration of advanced technologies.

  • Patent activity in NPWT devices focuses on innovations that improve suction efficiency and dressing compatibility. Over 1,000 patents have been filed in the past decade, with recent filings emphasizing sensor integration for better wound monitoring and patient comfort.
  • HBOT devices have seen a surge in patents aimed at enhancing chamber design and oxygen delivery systems. Historically, around 800 patents have been filed, with new patents focusing on portable and user-friendly models that increase accessibility and patient compliance.
  • The incorporation of smart technologies in wound therapy devices is a key patent driver, with approximately 600 patents filed focusing on AI-driven monitoring and automated pressure adjustment systems. Future innovations are expected to enhance device automation and personalised treatment protocols.
These drivers foster a dynamic patent landscape, promoting cutting-edge innovations in wound care technology, which enhance treatment efficacy, patient safety, and device adoption in clinical practice.

Global Wound Therapy Devices Patent Segmentation Analysis

The report provides an in-depth analysis of the patents in this field by the following segmentation :

Analysis by Product

  • Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) Devices
  • Oxygen and Hyperbaric Oxygen Equipment
  • Electric Stimulation Devices
  • Pressure Relief Devices
  • Others
The patent segmentation in the wound therapy devices industry includes NPWT devices, oxygen and hyperbaric oxygen equipment, electric stimulation devices, pressure relief devices, and Others. Among these, NPWT devices lead the patent landscape with over 1,500 patents granted historically and more than 200 new filings in the last year. This leadership is driven by innovations in system efficiency and sensor integration for real-time monitoring. Future growth is expected as advancements focus on enhancing patient comfort and device portability, further solidifying NPWT devices' dominance in the patent landscape.

Analysis by Wound Type

  • Acute Wound
  • Chronic Wound
The patent segmentation by wound type includes acute wounds and chronic wounds. Among these, chronic wound treatment devices dominate the patent landscape, with over 1,800 patents granted historically and more than 300 new filings recently. Their dominance is due to innovations aimed at improving long-term healing and patient care. Future patent growth is anticipated with advancements in AI-driven systems and personalised treatment approaches, enhancing chronic wound management.

Analysis by End User

  • Hospitals
  • Specialty Clinics
  • Ambulatory Surgical Centres
  • Others
The patent segmentation by end user includes hospitals, specialty clinics, ambulatory surgical centres, and others. Hospitals lead the patent landscape with over 2,000 patents historically and more than 250 new filings in the last year. This dominance is due to innovations in system integration and treatment efficiency. Future growth is expected as advancements target workflow optimisation and telemedicine capabilities, reinforcing hospitals' leadership in the patent landscape.

Wound Therapy Devices Patent Jurisdiction Analysis

The global patent landscape for wound therapy devices is characterised by significant activity across key regions, including the United States, Europe, and Asia Pacific. In the United States, over 2,000 patents have been filed, driven by major companies' focus on advanced wound care technologies and regulatory support. In Europe, particularly in Germany and the UK, over 1,500 patents emphasize innovations in device safety and efficiency, influenced by stringent regulatory standards and collaborative research efforts. The Asia Pacific region, notably China and Japan, has filed over 1,200 patents, reflecting a dynamic and expanding healthcare technology landscape, with an emphasis on cost-effective and scalable solutions.

Patent Profile of Key Companies

The patent landscape for wound therapy devices is shaped by several key companies driving innovation and securing intellectual property. Here is an overview of their patent activities.

Smith & Nephew Plc

Smith & Nephew, headquartered in London, UK, holds over 1,300 patents related to wound therapy devices, with around 150 patents in progress. The company focuses on innovations in NPWT systems and advanced wound dressings, emphasizing patient comfort and treatment efficacy. Smith & Nephew's strategic patent filings aim to maintain its leadership in wound care technology.

Mölnlycke Health Care AB

Mölnlycke Health Care, based in Gothenburg, Sweden, has filed over 1,000 patents in the wound therapy devices sector, with approximately 100 patents currently in progress. The company focuses on advanced dressing technologies and integrating smart systems into wound care devices. Mölnlycke's innovations are directed at improving patient outcomes and enhancing device functionality.

Other key players in the industry include Medical LLc., Kci Licensing Inc, and Hartmann Paul Ag.

  • Key Questions Answered in the Global Wound Therapy Devices Patent Landscape ReportWhat is the current state of the global patent landscape for wound therapy devices?
  • Which companies are leading patent filings in the wound therapy devices industry?
  • What are the key drivers of patent activity in the wound therapy devices industry?
  • How do NPWT and HBOT devices contribute to advancements in wound care driving patent landscape?
  • How does smart technology integration impactthe patent activities in wound therapy devices industry?
  • Which regions are most active in patent filings for wound therapy devices, and why?
  • How do patents for chronic wound treatment devices differ from those for acute wound management?
  • What future trends are anticipated in the wound therapy devices patent landscape?
  • How does the jurisdictional focus vary across different regions in wound therapy device patents?
  • What are the challenges faced by companies in securing patents for wound therapy devices?
  • How do patents for hospital-focused devices differ from those for specialty clinics and ambulatory centres?
  • What impact does regulatory compliance have on patent filings in the wound therapy devices industry?
  • How is the competitive landscape in the wound therapy devices industry shaped by patent activities?

Reasons to Purchase this Report

This report offers an in-depth analysis of the patent landscape, covering key trends, technological advancements, and regional insights. It provides detailed segmentation and highlights areas of significant innovation and activity. By examining leading companies' strategies and patent portfolios, the report elucidates competitive dynamics and emerging opportunities. Stakeholders will gain valuable information for strategic decision-making, ensuring they stay ahead in the evolving market. This comprehensive coverage makes it an essential resource for understanding the industry's future direction.


This product will be delivered within 5-7 business days.

Table of Contents

1 Introduction2 Executive Summary
3 Global Wound Therapy Devices Market Overview
3.1 Global Wound Therapy Devices Market Historical Value (2017-2023)
3.2 Global Wound Therapy Devices Market Forecast Value (2024-2032)
4 Global Wound Therapy Devices Market Segmentation
4.1 Global Wound Therapy Devices Market (2017-2032) By Product
4.1.1 Market Overview
4.1.2 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) Devices
4.1.3 Oxygen and Hyperbaric Oxygen Equipment
4.1.4 Electric Stimulation Devices
4.1.5 Pressure Relief Devices
4.1.6 Others
4.2 Global Wound Therapy Devices Market (2017-2032) by Wound Type
4.2.1 Market Overview
4.2.2 Acute Wound
4.2.3 Chronic Wound
4.3 Global Wound Therapy Devices Market (2017-2032) by End User
4.3.1 Market Overview
4.3.2 Hospitals
4.3.3 Specialty Clinics
4.3.4 Ambulatory Surgical Centres
4.3.5 Others
5 Global Market Dynamics
5.1 Market Drivers and Constraints
5.2 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
5.3 PESTEL Analysis
5.4 Industry Events, Initiatives, and Trends
5.5 Value Chain Analysis
6 Global Wound Therapy Devices Patent Landscape Analysis
6.1 Patent Distribution by Publication Year
6.2 Patent Distribution by Application Year
6.3 Patent Distribution by Priority Year
6.4 Analysis by Type of Patent
6.4.1 Granted Patents
6.4.2 Patent Application
6.4.3 Amended Application
6.4.4 Search Report
6.5 Analysis by Legal Status
6.5.1 Active
6.5.2 Pending
6.5.3 Expired/Discontinued
6.6 Analysis by Patent Jurisdiction
6.7 Analysis by Patent Age
6.8 Analysis by Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) Codes
6.9 Average Time to Publish a Patent
6.9.1 By Entities
6.9.2 By Jurisdiction
6.9.3 By Technology
6.10 Analysis by Type of Entity (Academic and Non-Academic)
6.11 Analysis by Top Applicants
6.12 Analysis by Top Inventors
7 Global Wound Therapy Devices Patent Analysis by Technology
7.1 Total Patents by Top Technologies
7.2 Time Evolution of Patents by Technology
7.3 Emerging Technologies
7.4 Patent Segmentation, By Product
7.4.1 Time Evolution by Number of Patents
7.4.2 Time Evolution by Number of Patent Families
7.4.3 Analysis by Type of Entity (Academic vs Non-Academic)
7.4.4 Analysis by Top Applicants
7.4.5 Analysis by Top Inventors
8 Patent Valuation Analysis
8.1 Assessment Methodology
8.2 High Value Patents
8.3 Medium Value Patents
8.4 Low Value Patents
9 Global Wound Therapy Devices - Top 10 Players Patent Analysis
9.1 Top 10 Entities by Number of Patents
9.2 Analysis by Publication Year
9.3 Analysis by Application Year
9.4 Analysis by Priority Year
9.5 Analysis by Type of Patent
9.6 Analysis by Jurisdiction
9.7 Analysis by Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) Codes
9.8 Analysis by Source of Innovation
9.9 Analysis by Forward and Backward Citations
9.10 Analysis by Legal Status
9.11 Analysis by Patent Age
9.12 Analysis by Key Inventors
9.13 Entity Dynamics
9.13.1 Analysis by Type of Player (Academic vs Non-Academic)
9.13.2 Analysis by Collaboration
9.13.3 Analysis by Technology
9.13.4 Newcomers
9.13.4.1 Start-up Companies
9.13.4.2 Established Companies
10 Patent Profile of Key Players
10.1 Medical Llc
10.1.1 Product Portfolio
10.1.2 Patent Portfolio by Patent Families
10.1.3 Time Evolution of Patents
10.1.4 Geographical Patent Coverage
10.1.5 Patent Analysis by Technology
10.1.6 Patent News and Developments
10.1.7 Financial Analysis
10.1.8 SWOT Analysis
10.2 Moelnlycke Health Care Ab
10.3 Smith & Nephew Inc
10.4 Kci Licensing Inc
10.5 Hartmann Paul Ag
11 Future Trends
12 Global Wound Therapy Devices Landscape (Additional Insight)*
12.1 Global Wound Therapy Devices Market: Developers Landscape
12.1.1 Analysis by Year of Establishment
12.1.2 Analysis by Company Size
12.1.3 Analysis by Region
12.2 Global Wound Therapy Devices Market: Product Landscape
12.2.1 Analysis by Product
12.2.2 Analysis by Wound Type

Companies Mentioned

  • Kci Licensing Inc
  • Smith & Nephew Inc
  • Medical Llc
  • Moelnlycke Health Care Ab
  • Hartmann Paul Ag
  • Medtronic plc
  • Genentech Inc
  • Massachusetts Inst Technology
  • Human Genome Sciences Inc
  • Dexcom Inc
  • Bristol Myers Squibb Co
  • Novartis AG
  • Smithkline Beecham Corp
  • Amgen Inc
  • Allergan Inc
  • Zymogenetics Inc
  • Cardiac Pacemakers Inc
  • Covidien Lp
  • Ethicon Endo Surgery Inc

Methodology

Loading
LOADING...

Table Information