+353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
+44-20-3973-8888REST OF WORLD
1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S
1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)

Cognitive Enhancement Wearable Technology Patent Landscape Report

  • PDF Icon

    Report

  • 200 Pages
  • August 2024
  • Region: Global
  • Expert Market Research
  • ID: 5997675
The cognitive enhancement wearable technology market was valued at USD 332.6 billion in 2023. It is expected to grow at a CAGR of 15.2% during the forecast period of 2024-2032 and attain a market value of USD 1.18 trillion by 2032. The growth is fueled by a dynamic patent landscape, marked by continuous innovations in EEG and neurostimulation technologies, advanced miniaturisation, and seamless digital integration, driving extensive patent filings and technological advancements in the field.

Patent Landscape Report Coverage

Global Cognitive Enhancement Wearable Technology Patent Outlook

  • Breakthroughs in EEG and neurostimulation technologies are driving a surge in patent filings. Innovations in brainwave detection and stimulation precision, spearheaded by companies like Abbott Lab, underscore the relentless pursuit of cognitive enhancement excellence.
  • Industry leaders such as Abbott Lab, IBM Corporation, and Nestec SA dominate the patent landscape. With extensive portfolios, these companies are continually pushing the envelope, filing patents for advanced miniaturization, wearable comfort, and seamless digital integration.
  • The United States leads with over 600 patents, bolstered by robust R&D and stringent patent laws. Europe, with 500 patents, focuses on user-centric designs and comfort, while Asia-Pacific rapidly advances with 450 patents, driven by burgeoning healthcare domain and significant tech investments.

Cognitive Enhancement Wearable Technology: Introduction

Cognitive enhancement wearable technology encompasses devices designed to improve cognitive functions such as memory, attention, and problem-solving. These wearables include EEG headsets, tDCS devices, and smart headbands, which are used in various applications from personal cognitive training to clinical treatments for neurological conditions. The integration of advanced sensors and stimulation techniques enables these devices to provide real-time cognitive feedback and enhancement, making them pivotal in both consumer and medical domain.

  • Patents focus on innovative EEG and neurostimulation technologies, enhancing the accuracy and effectiveness of cognitive monitoring and stimulation. Devices incorporating these advancements, such as those by Abbott Lab, emphasize improved brainwave detection and stimulation precision, with over 300 patents filed for these technologies.
  • Recent patents emphasize the miniaturisation of components to improve the wearability and user comfort of cognitive enhancement devices. Innovations in this area include lightweight and compact designs, exemplified by headbands and caps from companies like IBM Corporation, with more than 200 patents focused on enhancing portability and user experience.
  • Patents for the seamless integration of wearable devices with digital platforms are crucial for real-time data analysis and personalised cognitive enhancement programs. Technologies enabling this integration, such as those developed by Nestec SA, highlight over 250 patents aimed at improving the connectivity and functionality of wearable cognitive enhancement devices.
These drivers foster a dynamic patent landscape, spurring innovations in EEG and neurostimulation technologies, miniaturisation, and digital platform integration, enhancing the effectiveness and accessibility of cognitive enhancement wearables.

Global Cognitive Enhancement Wearable Technology Patent Segmentation Analysis

The report provides an in-depth analysis of the patents in this field by the following segmentation:

Analysis by Technology

  • Electroencephalogram (EEG)
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
  • Others
The segmentation in the cognitive enhancement wearable technology industry by technology include EEG, tDCS, and others. EEG technology leads this segment, with over 400 patents filed historically and 150 currently active. Its ability to monitor and enhance brain activity with high precision drives this dominance. Future projections estimate over 200 additional patents, focusing on further advancements in EEG technology.

Analysis by Device Type

  • Audio Headset
  • Head bands
  • Head Cap
  • Others
The segmentation by device type in the cognitive enhancement wearable technology industry include audio headsets, headbands, headcaps, and others. Headbands lead this segment with over 300 patents filed historically and 120 currently active. Their convenience and widespread adoption in both consumer and clinical settings drive this focus. Future expectations suggest over 180 additional patents, reflecting continuous innovations in headband designs.

Cognitive Enhancement Wearable Technology Patent Jurisdiction Analysis

The global patent landscape for cognitive enhancement wearable technology is evolving, with notable activity in the US, Europe, and Asia-Pacific.

The United States leads with over 600 patents filed historically and 250 currently in progress, driven by robust R&D infrastructure and strong patent protection laws, particularly in EEG and neurostimulation technologies. Europe holds a significant position with approximately 500 patents filed in the past and 180 active filings, focusing on miniaturization and wearable comfort. Asia-Pacific is rapidly advancing with 450 historical patents and 200 ongoing patents, fueled by expanding healthcare fieldand increasing investments in innovative cognitive enhancement technologies.

Patent Profile of Key Companies

The patent landscape for cognitive enhancement wearable technology is shaped by several key companies driving innovation and securing intellectual property. Here is an overview of their patent activities.

Abbott Lab.
Abbott Lab leads the cognitive enhancement wearable technology patent landscape with over 300 patents filed historically and 120 currently in progress. Their focus on advanced EEG and neurostimulation technologies drives their patent activity. Future projections suggest over 150 additional patents, reflecting continuous advancements in cognitive enhancement technologies.

IBM Corporation

IBM Corporation is a key player with 250 patents historically filed and 100 patents currently being pursued. Their commitment to developing miniaturized and user-friendly cognitive enhancement devices has propelled their growth. An estimated 130 more patents are expected, showcasing their ongoing innovations and domain influence.

Nestec SA

Nestec SA holds a prominent position with 200 patents historically filed and 90 patents currently active. Their focus on integrating wearable cognitive enhancement devices with digital platforms has driven significant innovation. Future projections indicate over 120 additional patents, reflecting their continuous advancements in this field.

Other key players in the landscape include the University of California and Koninkl Philips Electronics NV.

Key Questions Answered in the Global Cognitive Enhancement Wearable Technology Patent Landscape Report

  • What are the latest technological innovations in cognitive enhancement wearable technology?
  • Which companies are leading patent filings for cognitive enhancement wearables?
  • How many patents have Abbott Lab, IBM Corporation, and Nestec SA filed historically and currently?
  • What are the major trends in patent filings by technology, specifically for EEG and tDCS?
  • How do patent activities differ across device types such as headbands and headcaps?
  • What is the patent landscape for different jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and Asia-Pacific?
  • Why does the United States lead in patent filings for cognitive enhancement wearable technology?
  • What are Europe’s contributions to the patent landscape for cognitive enhancement wearables?
  • How is the Asia-Pacific region advancing in patent filings for these devices?
  • What are the emerging opportunities from the patent portfolios of key companies?
  • How do patent strategies impact competitive advantage?
  • What are the implications of patent filings in cognitive enhancement wearable technology?
  • What are the challenges and opportunities in the cognitive enhancement wearable technology patent landscape?
  • What are the regulatory and legal considerations?

Reasons to Purchase this Report

This report offers an in-depth analysis of the patent landscape, covering key trends, technological advancements, and regional insights. It provides detailed segmentation and highlights areas of significant innovation and activity. By examining leading companies' strategies and patent portfolios, the report elucidates competitive dynamics and emerging opportunities. Stakeholders will gain valuable information for strategic decision-making, ensuring they stay ahead in the evolving landscape. This comprehensive coverage makes it an essential resource for understanding the industry's future direction.


This product will be delivered within 5-7 business days.

Table of Contents

1 Introduction2 Executive Summary
3 Global Cognitive Enhancement Wearable Technology Market Overview
3.1 Global Cognitive Enhancement Wearable Technology Market Historical Value (2017-2023)
3.2 Global Cognitive Enhancement Wearable Technology Market Forecast Value (2024-2032)
4 Global Cognitive Enhancement Wearable Technology Market Segmentation
4.1 Global Cognitive Enhancement Wearable Technology Market (2017-2032) By Technology
4.1.1 Market Overview
4.1.2 Electroencephalogram (EEG)
4.1.3 Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
4.1.4 Others
4.2 Global Cognitive Enhancement Wearable Technology Market (2017-2032) by Device Type
4.2.1 Market Overview
4.2.2 Audio Headset
4.2.3 Head bands
4.2.4 Head Cap
4.2.5 Others
5 Global Market Dynamics
5.1 Market Drivers and Constraints
5.2 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
5.3 PESTEL Analysis
5.4 Industry Events, Initiatives, and Trends
5.5 Value Chain Analysis
6 Global Cognitive Enhancement Wearable Technology Patent Landscape Analysis
6.1 Patent Distribution by Publication Year
6.2 Patent Distribution by Application Year
6.3 Patent Distribution by Priority Year
6.4 Analysis by Type of Patent
6.4.1 Granted Patents
6.4.2 Patent Application
6.4.3 Amended Application
6.4.4 Search Report
6.5 Analysis by Legal Status
6.5.1 Active
6.5.2 Pending
6.5.3 Expired/Discontinued
6.6 Analysis by Patent Jurisdiction
6.7 Analysis by Patent Age
6.8 Analysis by Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) Codes
6.9 Average Time to Publish a Patent
6.9.1 By Entities
6.9.2 By Jurisdiction
6.9.3 By Technology
6.10 Analysis by Type of Entity (Academic and Non-Academic)
6.11 Analysis by Top Applicants
6.12 Analysis by Top Inventors
7 Global Cognitive Enhancement Wearable Technology Patent Analysis by Technology
7.1 Total Patents by Top Technologies
7.2 Time Evolution of Patents by Technology
7.3 Emerging Technologies
7.4 Patent Segmentation, By Technology
7.4.1 Time Evolution by Number of Patents
7.4.2 Time Evolution by Number of Patent Families
7.4.3 Analysis by Type of Entity (Academic vs Non-Academic)
7.4.4 Analysis by Top Applicants
7.4.5 Analysis by Top Inventors
7.5 Patent Segmentation, By Device Type
8 Patent Valuation Analysis
8.1 Assessment Methodology
8.2 High Value Patents
8.3 Medium Value Patents
8.4 Low Value Patents
9 Global Cognitive Enhancement Wearable Technology - Top 10 Players Patent Analysis
9.1 Top 10 Entities by Number of Patents
9.2 Analysis by Publication Year
9.3 Analysis by Application Year
9.4 Analysis by Priority Year
9.5 Analysis by Type of Patent
9.6 Analysis by Jurisdiction
9.7 Analysis by Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) Codes
9.8 Analysis by Source of Innovation
9.9 Analysis by Forward and Backward Citations
9.10 Analysis by Legal Status
9.11 Analysis by Patent Age
9.12 Analysis by Key Inventors
9.13 Entity Dynamics
9.13.1 Analysis by Type of Player (Academic vs Non-Academic)
9.13.2 Analysis by Collaboration
9.13.3 Analysis by Technology
9.13.4 Newcomers
9.13.4.1 Start-up Companies
9.13.4.2 Established Companies
10 Patent Profile of Key Players
10.1 Abbott Lab.
10.1.1 Product Portfolio
10.1.2 Patent Portfolio by Patent Families
10.1.3 Time Evolution of Patents
10.1.4 Geographical Patent Coverage
10.1.5 Patent Analysis by Technology
10.1.6 Patent News and Developments
10.1.7 Financial Analysis
10.1.8 SWOT Analysis
10.2 IBM Corporation
10.3 Nestec SA
10.4 University of California
10.5 Koninkl Philips Electronics NV
11 Future Trends
12 Global Cognitive Enhancement Wearable Technology Landscape (Additional Insight)*
12.1 Global Cognitive Enhancement Wearable Technology: Developers Landscape
12.1.1 Analysis by Year of Establishment
12.1.2 Analysis by Company Size
12.1.3 Analysis by Region
12.2 Global Cognitive Enhancement Wearable Technology: Product Landscape
12.2.1 Analysis by Technology
12.2.2 Analysis by Device Type

Companies Mentioned

  • IBM Corporation
  • Koninkl Philips Electronics NV
  • Abbott Lab.
  • Nestec SA
  • University of California

Methodology

Loading
LOADING...

Table Information